[–]chipsnmilk
His reason maybe misplaced but the question is legit. With a good sanitation system, a country can save billions of dollars.
Less people falling sick, more productivity, more $$.

他的理由可能错了，但问题是正当的。拥有良好的卫生系统，那国家就能节省数十亿美元。更少的人会得病，更多的生产力，更多的钱。

[–]S1r1usBl4ck
Our govt is trying to do exactly that.he goal is to have toilets in every household by 2019 and be open defecation free by then. Although we are making progress, we still have some way to go.

我们的政府正尝试努力做到这点。他的目标是到2019年每个家庭都有厕所，那时可以开放免费排便。尽管我们正取得进步，但仍有一些路要走。

[–]fat_piggy
No modern sewage system can handle trash along with sewage. We throw so much junk on streets. System is bound to get blocked.

没有现代的污水处理系统可以处理污水里的垃圾。我们在街上扔了这么多垃圾。系统一定会被阻塞。

[–]SouthieSaarSant Mudiji
You got triggered by /Pakistani. They don't have toilets for themselves too.
I know it doesn't absolve anything, but I'm just saying.

你被巴基斯坦人和激了，他们也没有自己的厕所。我知道这不能解决任何问题，我只是说说。

[–]antigonegirl
Let me ruin your day.

It's not just designated streets it should actually be designated rivers. India generates 62k Million litres per day (MLD) of raw sewage. Of this 40k MLD is not treated and discharged directly into our rivers or the sea (Mumbai alone discharges 1.3k MLD of raw shot into the Arabian Sea).

这不止要指定街道，还要指定河流。印度每天产生62亿升污水，其中40亿升被排进我们的河流或海洋中。（仅孟买就有13亿升未经处理的污水注入阿拉伯海。）

To improve our sewage infrastructure would require no less than $ 30 billion (this is just for STP's), to build or upgrade our sewage pipeline networks would need nothing less than $ 100 billion + relevant Opex. In essence, we need Rs 8l crores to just provide basic sewage facilities that even other mid income countries take for granted.

要改善我们的污水处理系统，需要不少于300亿美元（仅为了建设系统），建设或升级我们的污水管道网需要不少于1000亿美元加上相关的运营成本。本质上，只提供基础的污水处理系统我们也需要80亿卢比，即使是其他中等收入的国家也认为理所当然。

Is there hope? I think so. If you look at our giant Northern neighbor, did not have even one STP till about 1983. As of today, treats 65% of it's shit, as opposed to India's 25%. On this, we seem to be ahead of the curve (one of the few things) and sustained investments should help alleviate the problem.

有希望吗？我觉得有。如果你看看我们北方的邻居，在大约1983年时才开始有STP，现在，它处理了65%的大便，而印度只有25%。这方面，我们似乎在某些事情上走在了前沿（注：此为讽刺说法），持续的投资应该有助于缓解这个问题。

However, and there is a however, there are two huge problems. Under over constitution, Sewage systems and networks come under the state. Second, herself in the early 90's dropped the subsidy programs for sewage programs and water metering and upped rates to ensure that a self sustaining system could run based on revenues + some element of central funding.

然而，有两个巨大问题。宪法规定，STP和网络都是国家所有。其次，在90年代初放弃了污水处理的补贴项目，提高效率以确保有一个在收入以及中央资金的基础下、能够自给自足运行的系统。

This is why a de ocracy is bad, relative to a single party set up. Our netas will trip over themselves to fund stupid farm loan waivers every 3,4 years, as that wins votes. Something like investing in sewage systems is "not sexy" and hence it might never get the attention it deserves.

Now, I am depressed.

这就是为什么相对于一个政党的建立，民*是糟糕的。我们的政客每3~4年将会为愚蠢的农场贷款提供资金，以赢得选票。像投资污水系统这样的事情“并不性感”，因此它可能永远得不到应有的重视。

现在我很难过。