Ken Wright, Burnley, 4 hours ago

Don¿t underestimate the nuclear power of little Britain. Message to Rasputin. If you send them we will do the same so it¿s a no win situation. Along with the USA.

别低估小小英国的核武器实力。跟普京发消息说一下。如果你发射，我们也会发射，没有赢家。美国也会采取行动。

HUE says, in London, United Kingdom, 1 hour ago

Ken ~ historically, WHO has invaded WHO? Russia has absolutely NO intention of attacking anybody, and certainly not plucky wee Britain. The United States spends MORE on 'defense' (actually offence, and grotesque offence at that) than SEVERAL countries COMBINED (including us AND Russia). You see all these missile-thingmies {whether REAL or not) THAT is Their D E T E R R E N T. Who'd-a-thunk-it, eh?!? THEY are surrounded by NATO ~ WE are not surrounded by Russia.

Ken，历史上，谁侵略了谁？俄罗斯绝对没有攻击任何人的意图，当然英国也没有这个胆量。美国在“防御”(实际上是犯罪)上的花费超过了几个国家(包括美国和俄罗斯)的总和。你看到所有的这些导弹，不管是真实的还是真实的，都是他们的威慑力量。他们被北约包围，我们没有被俄罗斯包围。

shemp, Porpoise spit, Australia, 4 hours ago

I wonder when Trump will tweet about Pathetic Putin....

我很好奇特朗普什么时候会发推文可怜普京

David FNP, Phoenix, United States, 4 hours ago

A laser with at least a terawatt energy profile (with sufficient (energy) range) is all you need, and then all ICBMs become obsolete and redundant, as all would be shot down by the laser, no matter how many were fired and no matter how fast they go. ICBMs are becoming obsolete.

你所需要的就是至少太瓦配置的激光器(有足够的能量)，然后所有的洲际弹道导弹都将变得过时和多余，因为所有武器都将被激光击落，不管发射了多少数量，不管它们飞得有多快。洲际弹道导弹正在慢慢过时。

WELDER1, BETHEL SPRINGS, United States, 4 hours ago

Mach 5 is max speed. Mach 20 would melt it from air friction. The space shuttle reentered the atmosphere at slower speeds than that and we see how that went. As for this being new technology, no, it isn't. We have been capable of these speeds for decades but all of the arms treaties limit the official speeds to mach 2.7

能达到马赫5就顶天了。20马赫会使它自身在空气摩擦中融化掉。航天飞机以比这个慢的速度重新进入大气层，我们都能看到会发生什么。至于这是不是一项新技术，不，不是。我们掌握这种速度已经几十年了，但所有的军火条约都将官方速度限制在2.7马赫以下。

Nazerene, Najaf, 39 minutes ago

It only reaches high speeds after rendering the earths atmosphere. Anyway, believe what you want our crazy politicians have bunkers, we don¿t.

它只有在离开了地球大气层之后才能达到高速。不管怎么说，你愿意相信什么就相信什么吧，我们疯狂的政治家们有碉堡，我们可没有。

Whatsayyou, Vamo, United States, 5 hours ago

I don't understand. Hasn't are government told us since the late 80s that Russia's economy failed? How are they able to do this?

我不太明白。政府不是一直跟我们说，80年后末期后，俄罗斯的经济就陷入衰退，他们怎么还有能力做到这个？

Castlerock, Montreal, Canada, 3 hours ago

Nuclear weapons are far cheaper than conventional ones. NATO outspends Russia12:1 on defense. Russia is not even trying to match NATO's conventional forces. They are only producing their latest conventional weapons in modest numbers and are upgrading older weapons. Their defense doctrine is to use nuclear weapons when their conventional forces are overwhelmed.

核武器比常规武器便宜多了。北约的国防实力是俄罗斯的12倍。俄罗斯连北约的常规武器都打不过。他们只能生产最少的新型常规武器，升级旧武器。他们的国防教义是如果常规武器招架不住，才开始使用核武器。

Ulya, Russia and, Iran, 6 hours ago

So much emotion, not so much logical thinking. New ICBM replaces old missile, this is nothing new. The development of hypersonic re-entry vehicles and cruise missiles is needed to counter the US pulling out of the ABM treaty and putting missiles on our border. All this does is restore the balance of MAD

大家都是全凭感性，都没有用逻辑来思考。新洲际弹道导弹取代了旧导弹，这并非什么新鲜事。研发高超声速可返回飞行器和巡航导弹是必要的，这样才能对抗美国退出反弹道导弹条约并将导弹部署到我们的边境。这一切都是为了恢复疯子之间的平衡。

GaAs, London, United Kingdom, 6 hours ago

So Putin made reference the other day to Britian and America creating a new cold War. It seems to me Putin is solely responsible for it. The development of these weapons must have commenced long before the Novichok plot.

普京前几天刚提到英国和美国制造了新一轮冷战。在我看来，普京才应该对此事是负责。这些武器的发研发肯定早在诺维切克阴谋之前就开始了。