孟买高等法院：因相爱而发生关系不算强奸

Mano Naga

137

mano naga-4 hours ago

At last common sense prevailed. some women have it all to easy, thanks to stupid legality. Getting F**ed randomly then complain. Because of these B!tches court system is clogged and the real rape victims have to suffer the delay

最后，常识占了上风。一些女性自己太随便了，随意跟别人。。。然后再控告。因为这些女表子，法院系统都被堵了，真正的强奸受害者只能延迟受理。

Siddharth Mehta Siddharth-4 hours ago

concensus sex can never ever be rape and if it is then make women liable as rapist as well

双方同意的性行为不能算强奸，不然，女性可以被当做强奸犯。

Da Da

23253

Da Da-4 hours ago

It has become normal in our society first love then after break call sexual harassment .However HC has now given right decision.

现在的社会，初恋分手都会被指控性骚扰。。幸好高等法院作出了正确的判决。

25 Tantramantrayantrayoga

1092

Tantramantrayantrayoga-New Delhi-5 hours ago

That is a much sensible judgement in times when headings are filled with men accused and sentenced even if it is a break up in a normal relationship.

这是一个非常明智的判断。经常看到因为正常分手而被指控、判刑的人

Satbeer Gujjar

11609

Satbeer Gujjar-6 hours ago

Funny. He could have sex with a low caste woman, apparently that wouldn''t make him impure. But marrying her by signing a paper certificate in the registrar''s office would make him impure and lessen his dignity. Hahaha. The way the caste system has been tweaked and modified is horrible.

真有趣。他可以和一个低种姓的女人发生性关系，显然这不会使他不纯洁。但是，如果他在司法常务官办公室签署纸质证书，与她结婚，就会使他变得不纯洁，并辱没他的尊严。哈哈哈。种姓制度太可怕了。

Rafi Uddin

1573

Rafi Uddin-2 hours ago

Why judgement is different in different courts in the same kind of case when sc had already made it clear that sex with mutual consent is not rape.these judges are all crooks.

为什么在相同的情况下，不同的法庭会有不同的判决？高等法院已经明确表示，双方自愿的性行为不是强奸。这些法官都是骗子。

Hridoy Baruah

14737

Hridoy-2 hours ago

Judge is absolutely right.

法官太英明了。

Vnavale

692

Vnavale-Bengaluru-2 hours ago

The trial court judge should be sacked. it's not rape if man does not marry a woman. you don't even need to be a judge to know that.

应该把初审法院的法官炒了。男人不娶女人，不能算强奸。不需要做法官，我们就能知道这一点。