The Comparison of Apache vs Indian built LCH. who wins ?

“阿帕奇” vs 印度本土轻型战斗直升机（LCH），哪个赢？

The two helicopter which known for its significant multifunction's capacity that makes it more deadly superior for war. Apache was introduced in the year 1981 in US air force whereas LCH was made its first flight on 2010. for more info watch video do let us know your thoughts about both helicopters.  

这两款直升机以显著的多功能而闻名，在战争中更具有优势。阿帕奇于1981年被引入美国空军，而印度的LCH是在2010年首飞的。

以下是Youtube上印度网民的评论：

Ankit Mishra

FUN FACT : INDIA GOT BOTH OF THEM.

有趣的是，这两款直升机，印度都有。

deepak singh rajawat

Apache indeed a beast and awesome capabilities but in mountain warfare at high altitude LCH would perform better

阿帕奇确实像野兽，性能惊人，而在高海拔的山地作战中LCH的表现会更好

Kaustabh Singha Roy

LCH is designed for high mountains and it is a king there definitely on plains apache excel

LCH是为高山地区而设计的，山地作战没有对手。而阿帕奇绝对是平原上的王者

Jama

Wow  very impressive respect India from Somalia

哇，非常棒，佩服印度，来自索马里

Star Man

The only reason India made LCH because Indian needs to monitor over the Himalayas and LCH can fly over peaks of the top mountains but Apache cant do that at all.

印度制造LCH，是为了监视喜马拉雅山脉，LCH可以飞越高山，但阿帕奇根本做不到。

J__ c

Lch is light heli and apache is medium heli

LCH是轻型直升机，阿帕奇是中型直升机

siddhi naik

Lch is light attack heli and Apache is medium. LCH was designed to fight in the mighty himalayas where the average peak height is around 6.5 km.

LCH是轻型攻击直升机，阿帕奇是中型直升机。LCH是为了在平均峰高约6.5公里的喜马拉雅山战斗而设计的。

Wally Wolf

Both have a different design due to the difference between the tasks they are meant for. The Apache was designed as a heavy survivable helicopter to stem the red hordes on the plains of Europe. The LCH as a light attack and reconnaissance helicopter for high altitude and hot/humid conditions.

由于执行的任务不同，两者的设计都有所不同。阿帕奇是一种重型直升飞机，可以在欧洲平原上阻止他国入侵。LCH作为一种轻型攻击和侦察直升机，适应高空和炎热/潮湿的条件。

Vitamin Protein

LCH is made for high altitude Himalayan warfare......Apache is heavy attack helicopter

LCH是为喜马拉雅高原作战而造的.....阿帕奇是重型攻击直升机

Ashley Silver

Just look at the price difference Apach is 2.5 times costlier. Im sure LCH can be fitted with various bombs and guns. LCH also flies higher and further. Not much in the speed department just a little faster is the Apache. I believe the LCH wins purely because of its flight ceiling and range and cost.

看看二者的价格差异，阿帕奇比印度的LCH贵2.5倍。LCH可以装上各种炸弹和大炮。LCH可以飞得更高更远。在速度方面没有太多差别，阿帕奇稍微快一点。我认为LCH更胜一筹，飞行高度更高、航程更远和成本更低。

Jitendra Shing

This is just an example of growing up of "Atmanirbhar Bharat", Jai hind jai bharat..........

这只是“印度自力更生”的一个例子，印度万岁..........

quite July

Apache is a warthog on the battlefield but lch is designed to attack on mountains as in 1999 kargil war india realised that they require a attack helicopter for such areas.

Both play different roles

阿帕奇是战场上的疣猪，而LCH是为山区作战而设计的，在1999年的卡吉尔战争中，印度意识到需要适合山区作战的攻击直升机。两者扮演着不同的角色

Kujo Jitendra

Both are different and both are just

两者是不同的，都很棒

herearewe

Dude Apache is heavier and it is a Medium weight heavy support helicopter while LCH is a lightweight and support helicopter designed considering the Himalayan terrain in consideration.

阿帕奇更重，是一款中等重量的重型支援直升机，而LCH是轻型支援直升机，设计时考虑到了喜马拉雅地区的地形。

IndianDragon

Indian government should push for lch, it is inhouse and highly capable machine.

印度政府应该推LCH，本土的，性能很强。

SashaG

LCH primarily is developed for high altitude missions. You can call it china centric. As tensions flair between both countries, LCH is becoming more relevant. Galwan clash has changed everything.

LCH主要是为高海拔地区作战而开发的，可以说主要是为了对付中国。随着两国关系的紧张，LCH的重要型突显。

Prabhat kumar

Lch is lighter than apache

That's why it's called lch

LCH比阿帕奇轻, 叫轻型战斗直升机

vishvendra Singh

Both are different category helicopter, both are designed for totally different type of warfare..

这两种直升机属于不同类别，是为完全不同类型的战斗设计的。

Nobody In here

The two helicopters are different in sizes, power, weight capabilities, technology, radars, weapon payloads and meant for different missions. There's absolutely no comparison between them and India buying both of them is meant to compliment each other NOT to replace either

这两款直升机在尺寸、功率、重量能力、技术、雷达、武器有效载荷等方面都不同，用于执行不同的任务。绝对没有可比性，两者可以互补，而不是一个取代任何一个

GND Ag

Can't compare- LCH is designed spcifically for high altitude mountain warefare

不能比。LCH是专为高海拔山地战设计的

Aditya Tyagi

Though the Apache may outperform the LCH, the LCH gives far greater bang for the buck than the Apache.

阿帕奇的表现可能优于LCH，而LCH比阿帕奇的价值要大得多。

Default Option

Kee in view the prices, LCH is clearly ahead!

从价格来看，我们的LCH明显有优势啊！

Jotendra Kumar

Having both is an advantage as they can be used depending on the requirement needed.

两个都有，更有优势，可以根据不同的需要使用。

rajib chakroborthy

Two are different class no comparison lch is best in mountanious hilly terrain

二者是不同类别的，没有可比性，在山地丘陵地带，LCH是最棒的

Croco Z

I am impressed by lch

我对LCH印象深刻

Mr. Dongare

The real test would be in Ladakh and the Himalayas in the war against China, very proud of LCH

真正的考验是在拉达克和喜马拉雅山区的战斗中，我为LCH感到骄傲

SANTOSH KUMAR SAHOO

Apache is heavyweight and LCH is lightweight, maintainance cost is very high in case of Apache, while LCH can do the same that an Apache can do with a low budget and low maintainance. LCH is designed for high altitude warfare in Himalayan region, in high altitude war Apache is less effective because of it's weight.

阿帕奇是重量级的直升机，而LCH是轻量级的，阿帕奇的维护成本非常高，而LCH的维护成本低，同时能完成阿帕奇一样的任务。LCH是为喜马拉雅地区的高海拔作战而设计的，阿帕奇是重型直升机，在高海拔战争中，没有多少优势

Boris Badinov

I could never imagine a situation where the apache and LCH are against each other. I hope for a strong alliance between the US and India

无法想象阿帕奇和LCH互相对抗的情形。希望美国和印度结成强有力的联盟

BLUERAY1611

Nowadays Apaches are exclusive used by Talibans in Afghanistan.

现在阿帕奇独家专供阿富汗的塔利班使用啊。

Ghost Diaries

Apache still looks cool

阿帕奇看起来很酷