Ukraine Vs Russia: Comparing the Military capabilities

乌克兰VS俄罗斯：军事实力比较

How do Russia & Ukraine compare militarily? Which side are the odds stacked against? Who will have the edge in case of a war?

在军事方面，俄罗斯和乌克兰相比较的话，哪一方更弱？如果爆发战争，谁有优势?

以下是Youtube上印度网民的评论：

Freddie Nerkury

The other issue is that an attacking force generally has greater challenges in invading as opposed to a defending force.

在入侵中，进攻部队通常比防守部队面临更大的挑战。

Jasnoor Arora(Noor)

Thanks for letting the world know something huge is brewing.

谢谢你让全世界知道一件大事正在酝酿之中。

Attay Muatkang

Modern battle is not about the quantity of soldiers but it is about the best technology, brilliant strategies and intelligence together with quantity of ammunitions.

现代战争的关键不在于兵力的多少，而在于技术是否先进、战略是否高明、情报的获取和弹药的数量。

Soul

Ukrainians are one of toughest people I know. They show no fear and are content   On fighting for their freedom despite the massacre army they face. I’m falling in love with Ukrainians.

乌克兰人是我所知的最坚强的民族之一。他们没有表现出恐惧，他们为自 由而战，尽管他们面对的是凶残的军队。我爱乌克兰人。

Laze Dimovski

One small detail you've forgot to mention, how modern are those weapons Ukraine has... Most of them are probably in Russia's museums for years already.

乌克兰的武器非常“现代化”，其中大部分可能已经在俄罗斯的博物馆里收藏多年了。

ferdinand foch

In case of war, if they fight on Ukraine soil, the Ukraine will have more casualties irregardless of their military capabilities and support they are offered by the west

一旦发生战争，如果他们在乌克兰领土上作战，乌克兰将会出现更多的伤亡，不管他们的军事能力如何，也不管他们是否得到了西方的支持

Mutimba Ahmed

Don't be taken for a fool, you can't compare Russia to Ukraine, it's ridiculous that out of context completely

别傻了，不能拿俄罗斯和乌克兰做比较，完全是断章取义

Chibyke Collins

Common now ,stop it already don't disrespect russia

别比了，这是侮辱俄罗斯

DystoXGamez

In 1314 a small Scottish army of farmers defeated the English army's heavily armored knights with nothing but wooden spikes and the will to kill.

Wng a war is all about strategy, not about who has the most equipment.

1314年，一支由苏格兰农民组成的小部队凭借狼牙棒击败了英国军队全副武装的骑士。赢得战争的关键在于战略，而不是看谁拥有最多的装备。

rakuguy

not really apples to apples comparison. I doubt Russia will deploy 100% of it's forces to engage Ukraine. It has other borders to defend in a vast country it cannot leave totally undefended.

并不是真正的同等级比较。我觉得俄罗斯不会部署 全部军队去对付乌克兰。俄罗斯是一个幅员辽阔的国家，还有其他的边界需要保卫。

Melvin

US is deploying 3000 troops not 300000.

美国部署了3000名士兵，不是30万。

V K Gupta

This particular crisis is a game of chicken between Russia and the West. The numbers do not matter. The longer this standoff continues the less is the likelihood of a shooting war for two reasons: (1) Russia has lost the initiative, and (2) the West has longer lead time to beef up their military preparations and fine tune the sanctions regime. So, it will be a diplomatic exercise to offer Russia a face saving opportunity to stand down.

这场危机是俄罗斯和西方之间的一场博弈。部队人数并不重要。

这种僵局持续的时间越长，爆发战争的可能性就越小，原因有二：

(1) 俄罗斯失去了主动权，

(2) 西方有更长的时间来加强军事准备，调整制裁制度。

因此，这是一场外交演习，为俄罗斯提供一个挽回颜面的退出机会。

Nwoudochi Obinna

it's not even close...

Ukraine can stand up the 2nd most powerful nation on earth... Ukraine can maybe fight a defensive war, but it won't carry on for very long beacuse of the surprisingly high amount of Russians in parts of Ukraine

两者相差甚远……乌克兰可以对抗世界上第二强大的国家，乌克兰或许可以打一场防御战，但不会持续太久，乌克兰部分地区的俄罗斯人数量惊人

Gary sabiya

In military conflict; it is always difficult to make a prediction because of the unknown factors.

在军事冲突期间，由于未知因素的存在，总是很难预测结果。

Dom M

Air Superiority is key to a successful offensive, while not having it makes a successful attack almost impossible. Take for instance the Battle of Ardennes in 1944, German offensive. The allied have had total air supremacy, and the German failed miserably. Tanks have no mobility if they are prey to constant air attacks and cannot do quick maneuvers anymore. Another example is the Battle of Britain in 1941. The Germans cancelled the invasion of Great Britain, because they failed to achieve air superiority. Not good enough to do an amphibious landing on foreign soil.

空中优势是成功进攻的关键，而没有空中优势则几乎不可能成功。以1944年的阿登战役为例，德军进攻。

盟军拥有绝对的制空权，德国人惨败。

坦克没有机动性，如果遭遇持续空袭，不能快速机动。

另一个例子是1941年的不列颠之战。德国人取消了对英国的入侵，当时没有取得制空权，还不足以在国外进行两栖登陆。

Paras Naradiya

If they want war then,

Russia would be almost impossible to invade ( geography and AA defences etc)

如果开战，俄罗斯几乎不可能入侵(考虑到地理位置和防空防御等)

EngleHump

If Russia defeats Ukraine militarily, it will lose them politically. As well, it will pay the price in occupation, foreign relations, economic ramifications and much more. It is in Russia's best interests to not invade. There is far more to lose than gain.

如果俄罗斯在军事上击败乌克兰，在政治上会输掉的。此外，俄罗斯还将为此付出代价。不入侵最符合俄罗斯的利益。入侵则得不偿失。

Hola Mexco!!!

I think you forgot that RUSSIA has 6500+ nuclear weapons.

我想你忘了俄罗斯有6500多枚核弹头。

Paul Keable

Defence mainly has the upper hand in a battle.

Ukraine seems equip enough to counter any Russian ground attack

在战争中，防御的一方占上风。

乌克兰的装备足以抵挡俄罗斯的任何强度的地面进攻

steven johnstone

Not that simple. Would Russia deploy all its forces to Ukraine. If it is afraid of NAT and others it would have to proportionately deploy elsewhere also otherwise it would leave a large proportion of its landmass and borderlines  vulnerable to attack, especially if it considers its attack on Ukraine would start WW3.

没那么简单。俄罗斯会把全部军队拉取对付乌克兰吗？

如果害怕NATO和其他国家，其他地方也得部署军队，否则其他地方容易受到攻击的，对乌克兰的攻击可能将引发第三次世界大战。

Hands and Paws

isn`t it obvious? without any help from allies Russia would definitely be ahead by a wide margin.

这不是显而易见的吗？如果乌克兰没有盟友的帮助，俄罗斯肯定安全占上风。

Agu Nwereobi

America has never lost to any nation on earth and its military capability is highly classified until you fall into their trap that's how you learn.

I strongly suggest diplomacy!

美国从来没有输给过地球上的任何国家，它的军事能力是高度机密的，等你落入他们的陷阱后才知道厉害。我强烈建议通过外交途径解决问题！

Green Gregs

Question is how much is Russia staging on Ukraine's border?

问题是俄罗斯在乌克兰边境部署了多少兵力？

UnitedPacci

i understand Putin concerns, but Ukrainians have a right to think for themselves and what they want without having Russians to invade.

我理解普京的担忧，乌克兰人有权为自己考虑，不需要俄罗斯人入侵。

Jamie Lake-Boyd

They both crazy.

他们都疯了

Tom Goddard

So ask yourself 'why would Ukraine ever ask for a conflict' ...Who is the aggressor in all conceivable logic .

乌克兰为什么要挑起冲突？谁是入侵者？

Paul Shearer

Quantity and quality are both determining factors when concluding military strength.  Unfortunately Russia is in front on both quantity and quality in most areas.

数量和质量都是决定军事实力的因素。不幸的是，在大多数领域，俄罗斯在数量和质量上都领先。

Sir Enrico

oppressor vs the oppressed..this situation should be a wake up call to smaller countries

压迫者 VS 被压迫者，这种情况给小国敲响了警钟。

Randall Price

Outcome of war is determined largely by the combatants will to fight. The Russians proved that in ww2.

战争的结果在很大程度上取决于战斗人员的战斗意愿。

俄国人在二战中证明了这一点

Xeev Laug

Base on percentage of population, Russia have less power than Ukraine. Ukraine have more friends than Russia too!

按人口比例计算，俄罗斯的实力不及乌克兰。乌克兰的朋友也比俄罗斯更多