印度拥有的核弹比中国、巴基斯坦少吗

Does India Have LESS Nukes Than China, Pak?

印度拥有的核弹比中国、巴基斯坦少吗?

以下是Youtube网友的评论：

Kevin Sabharwal

My dad once told me that France wanted to pay some local Indians for the sand that abundant in there area and the people was like you want the sand just take it. Turns out that sand was uranium. I'm not sure how true that story was but most Indian history he told me had truth to it.

我爸曾经告诉我，法国想要付钱给印度人购买当地的沙子，而当地人说，你想要沙子就拿去吧。原来那些沙子是铀。我不确定这个故事有多真实，但他告诉我的大多数印度历史都是真实的。

nil null

Important thing about nukes is that they need delivery vehicles. Our missiles contain unitary warheads, hence limiting the immediate deployability of nukes. With the most important delivery mechanism being SSBNs, of which India has a couple max right now, each with SLBMs with unitary warheads, I really don't think the number is higher than 200-250. I don't think many Brahmos are kept for nuke delivery either, as their conventional strike capability is very important without causing a nuclear escalation.

Having the fissile inventory is one thing, making nukes out of them and being able to deploy them at short notice is another.

关于核武器，重要的一点是核武器需要运载工具。

最重要的运载工具是弹道导弹战略核潜艇，印度目前最多有两艘，每艘都配有单发弹头的潜射导弹，我认为数量不超过200-250枚。

我认为很多布拉莫斯导弹不是用来发射核武器的，主要用来进行常规打击，不用进行核升级。

拥有可裂变材料库存是一回事，利用它们制造核武器并能够在短时间内部署是另一回事。

Mayank Joshi

I've always wondered why India has so less nukes but also knew somewhere in my head that India has much more than what anyone estimates

我一直想知道为什么印度的核武器这么少，但我也知道，印度拥有的核武器比任何人估计的都多

Solanum lycopersicum

To add to this, one important thing to remember is that nuclear warheads aren't just about the nuclear material, there are some very sensitive and delicate components involved that make them. These components tend to 'degenerate' (I use this for lack of a better word) fast, and thus warheads need routine maintenance and replacement of such components. Given Pakistan's rather volatile socio-political-economic state, I find it difficult to believe that they have a significant number of instantly deployable nukes.

除此之外，有一件重要的事情要记住，核弹头不仅仅关乎核材料，还有一些非常敏感和微妙的组成部分。这些部件会快速“退化”(我找不到更好的词了)，因此弹头需要例行维护，更换部件。考虑到巴基斯坦相当不稳定的社会、政治和经济状况，我很难相信他们拥有大量可立即部署的核武器。

Nikhil Bankar

Thank you for covering this, I always thought HOW come India has less nukes than Pakistan, I knew the numbers are definitely not accurate enough. We can easily tell by the trends/comparison in other aspects of military that India can never have less Nukes than Pakistan at least.

我一直在想，为什么印度的核武器比巴基斯坦少，我知道数字肯定不够准确。通过其他军事方面的比较，我们很容易地看出，至少印度拥有的核武器不会比巴基斯坦少。

Brijesh

India needs submarines. A lot of them. And need to invest heavily on R&D especially in AI, Quantum computing, drone tech. China is far ahead of us in these critical technologies as pointed by Rajiv Malhotra.

印度需要潜艇，需要很多。需要大力投资研发，特别是在人工智能、量子计算和无人机技术方面。正如拉吉夫·马尔霍特拉指出的，中国在这些关键技术上远远领先我们。

whitesoul_m3

There pre COVID estimate of Indian nuclear warheads by British Intel was 1500 exactly.

But such news isn't provided much clout - possibly by the Indian side themselves to keep India's modest peacekeeper image to the ordinary of the world.

The West pay no attention these days to what India does, so long it doesn't endanger their security.

During Russo Ukr war itself India successfully completed a nuclear drill with fighter jets at Pokhran range in broad daylight - planes involved were Rafale, Jaguars and Su30mki, but the West is busy with Russian threat and DPRKs ballistic missile tests since it impacts their security.

So India is more powerful than it is portrayed and its enemies are well aware of it just like we saw Pakistan's estimates which definitely came out of a combination of latest Chinese and deep state US intel.

在新冠疫情爆发之前，英国因特尔估计印度有1500枚核弹头。但这样的消息并没有太大的影响力，可能是印度想保持谦虚的形象。西方现在不关注印度做了什么，只要不危及他们的安全。

在俄乌战争期间，印度在光天化日之下在博克兰基地成功完成了一场核演习，参与演习的战机有阵风、美洲虎和苏-30mki，但西方忙于应对俄罗斯的威胁和朝鲜的弹道导弹试验，这危及他们的安全。

Rising Sun

Why isn't India using its vast reserves of Thorium for energy production? Wouldn't that be a game changer for rapid industrialization, electric vehicles and less dependence on fossils?

为什么印度不利用其庞大的钍储备来生产能源?

这难道不是游戏规则改变者吗？

能实现快速工业化、推广电动汽车和减少对化石依赖

Raguraman B

No. Of bombs isn’t relevant now a days. Imagine just a dirty bomb in Mumbai or Bangalore, can wreck havoc

核弹数量现在已经无关紧要了。想象一下，只要向孟买或班加罗尔发射一枚，就能造成灾难性破坏

Jyotiraditya Rakshit

I feel very proud when India reached to a certain level that can compete with other nations all because of the father of India's nuclear bomb "Homi Bhabha jhangir" Without him it would be impossible for us to be in the current stage .

我感到非常自豪，因为印度的核弹之父“霍米·巴巴，印度达到了可以与其他国家竞争的水平。没有他，我们不可能处于目前的阶段。

Abhijeet Kundu

There is a difference between normal uranium and weapon grade uranium. BTW, you don't even need 100 nukes. You just need one. That gives enough security from anybody.

普通铀和武器级铀是有区别的。顺便说一下，不需要100枚核武器，只要一枚就足以给我们带来安全感。

P U T I N

Pakistan's Nuclear Missile Range is very Low that Whenever They Fire.. It Blasts Before crossing Border

巴基斯坦核弹的射程非常低，还没过境就会爆炸

Aniket Sengupta

India is also coming up with a 3 stage nuclear program which involves running nuclear power plants with uranium, plutonium and thorium so most of the plutonium India has will be used for nuclear power plants not nuclear weapons. 1000 bombs equivalent doesn't mean all the fuel have been converted into warheads.

印度还提出了一个三级核项目，使用铀、钚和钍运作核电站，印度拥有的大部分钚用于核电站项目，而不是用来造核武器。相当于拥有1000枚核弹并不意味着所有材料都被制成核弹了。

Atomic Boi

Modiji: "Keep it Secret Baby, Don't BRAG, Let the Time come we will..….."

莫迪：“保密，保密，别吹，到时候我们就.....”

Team x official

The capability of India always in track to keep secret

印度的能力一直保密

Lonefighter

And one more point that is worth mentioning is that, there's a thing called second strike capability, and looking at Pakistan's size offcourse it won't certainly have it once a nuclear attack is conducted pakistan.

还有一点值得一提的是二次打击能力，从巴基斯坦的规模来看，一旦对巴基斯坦发动核攻击，他们肯定不会拥有二次打击能力。

GURU GANTAAL

THE PROBLEM WITH INDIA IS THAT IT HAS VERY NAIVE CITIZENS ....

印度的问题是公民太天真了....

Arihant

Point is not the number, but the collective yield in KT

重点不是数量，而是以千吨为单位的总爆炸当量

Time Traveller

A single assembled nuclear warhead would cost several million dollars on a year for the maintenance, seeing these facts India has assembled only 120 warheads and stored the necessary raw material for 2.5k warheads

一枚组装好的核弹头每年需要数百万美元的维护费用，鉴于这些事实，印度只组装了120枚弹头，并储存了造2500枚弹头所需的原材料

ankit arjun

inida might have 300 or more war heads ..may be it might be 1000

印度可能有300枚核弹或更多，可能是1000。

Maybe Poet

I don't think any country needed soo many nukes. Can you please tell the minimum and maxmum number of nukes any country needs

我认为没有哪个国家需要这么多核武器。你能告诉我一个国家最少需要多少核武器吗

Rajat Sharma

I think India doesn't talk about numbers which being less is because we want to be called responsible neuclear state and also nsg group membership without signing npt

我认为印度之所以不谈论核弹头数量，是因为我们希望在不签署核不扩散条约的情况下被称为负责任的核国家和核供应国集团成员

tech mania

I mean even if we had only 100,i think it's enough to cause irreparable harm to humanity

即使我们只有100枚核弹头，也足以对人类造成无法弥补的伤害

Prateek Pandey

If india can make 2000+ then China could do easily more

如果印度能造2000枚以上核弹头，那么中国可以轻松造更多

THe HARSHIT PASTARIYA

What about PRC (how much they have )& Why wud a country wanted to show their prowess

中国呢(他们有多少枚核弹？)，为什么一个国家想要展示自己的实力？

Gaurav Jadon

#askabhijeet sir tell us about Japanese army's war crime in China.