Who wins ? Chinese C919 vs. European A320 aircraft Comparison.
中国C919 vs 欧洲A320,谁赢?
以下是Youtube网友的评论:
Steven TAM
both are beautiful aircrafts - the C919 will be a good work horse for the domestic market and a good contender to break the duopoly of Airbus and boeing. Airbus, being an older manufacturer, would have the advantage of experience and design philosophy to iron out teething issues associated with new planes.
两款飞机都很漂亮。C919是国内市场的一匹黑马,也是打破空客和波音双头垄断的有力竞争者。
空客作为老牌飞机制造商,拥有经验和设计理念的优势,可解决与新飞机有关的初期问题。
chuishui chuishui1001
This is a breakthrough in China. It can fly to the sky, fly reliably, gain public recognition, and ensure safety.
对中国而言,C919是一个突破。它能飞上天空,飞得可靠,获得公众认可,有安全保证。
Philip Tan
The airbus A320 is a relatively ‘old’ aircraft and now it is a good time to introduce the comac 919 as Boeing 737max is still having an image problem.
空客A320是一款相对“老”的飞机,现在是推出中国商飞C919的好时机,波音737max的仍然存在形象问题。
Donald Li
With similar engine and similar amount of fuel, why does the range differ so much?
类似的发动机,类似的燃料量,为什么航程会有这么大的差异?
Nicholas Ngo
I wish the C919 can fly from Guangzhou to Tokyo non-stop!
希望C919能从广州直飞东京
Just Me
C919 has a range of 4000km and Guangzhou to Tokyo is ~3000km - non-stop ok?
C919的航程是4000公里,广州到东京的航程是3000公里,直飞没问题吧?
K W Wong
Should be no problem
应该没问题
Mohammed Qamar Ahmed
Air bus320 proved supermicy.
空客320更胜一筹。
Charlie Lou
yes finally there's a chines plane that can compete head on the western competitors.
终于有一款中国客机能与西方客机竞争了。
Sizz Flair
why must the China plane apply for the European commercial aircraft certification.
为什么中国飞机要申请欧洲商用飞机认证?
guanda
Boeing are currently unstable.
波音目前不稳定
Dk
Airbus A320 has flown millions of people around the globe., while the Chinese c919 has no such experience and is bound to fly just domestic China
空客A320载过全球无数人飞行。而中国的C919还没有投入商业运营,注定只能在中国国内飞行
Khurshid Anwar
China is going to be a serious competitor in hi - tech items sooner or later and commercial aircrafts are no exception.Moreover, it must keep in mind that just like USA due to its large area and large population it does not have to depend too much on overseas market.
中国迟早会成为高科技产品的有力竞争者,商用飞机也不例外。此外,中国必须记住,由于面积大,人口多,不必太依赖海外市场,就像美国一样。
Moa Aier
We badly need a third serious player in this segment. However I am sure the other two parties will pull out all tricks to stop the third party to join the party. But I hope that the third party will succeed. All the very best.
在这个领域,我们迫切需要第三个真正的玩家。
我相信其他两个会想尽一切办法阻止第三个加入。我希望第三方个能成功。祝一切顺利。
Hung Nguyen
China is having almost double the population of America and Europe combined. China will also grow to become a giant in the business world. Just domestic needs alone will do to help the Comac to commercially take off.
中国的人口几乎是美国和欧洲人口总和的两倍。中国也将成长为商业世界的巨人。仅国内需求就足以帮助中国商飞实现起飞。
chuishui chuishui1001
China plans to buy 1,000 c919
中国计划购买1000架C919
richardincm
@chuishui chuishui1001 Great news for the engine-makers, and all the other foreign suppliers, involved in the project !
对于参与这个项目的发动机制造商和所有外国供应商来说是个好消息!
Ben Benito
China is not a serious player. It has been building this plane for 14 years and is still in testing stage. The last thing we need now is another cheap Chinese copy.
严格来说,中国并不是一个玩家。这架飞机已经造了14年,仍处于测试阶段。我们现在最不需要的就是廉价的中国仿制品。
Wong wan chung
The Chinese C919 AIrliner Must be certified by ICAO, FAA and EASA to be manufactured and sell overseas to potential customers.
中国C919客机得通过国际民航组织、美国联邦航空局和欧洲航空安全局的认证才能生产并销售给潜在客户。
alex Lo
There is rumour that GE has quoted them selling price of the LEAP1c engine 8 fold sky rocket compare to it sells to Airbus or Boeing. Seems Comac is inclined to choice from other suppliers such its own domestic engine or Russian PD-14 as alternative.
有传言称,通用电气给他们的LEAP1c发动机的报价是报给空客或波音的8倍。
中国商飞似乎倾向于从其他供应商那里选择,比如国产发动机或俄罗斯的PD-14作为替代品。
Wu Lung
C919 engines diameter appear to larger and hence probably more efficient. legroom in the C919 is much better with 168 passengers and 4 feet longer compared with 184 passengers for the Airbus.
C919发动机的直径似乎更大,因此可能更有效率。C919的放脚空间要大得多,长4英尺载客人数为168人,空客载客人数为184人。
sammy muturi
Comac has a long way to go,like it must proof it safety record that might take some years.
中国商飞还有很长的路要走,比如必须证明自己的安全记录,这可能需要几年的时间。
A O
What is mind boggling for me is the C919 empty weight is less than of the A320 but the C919 has a max. range of just over 4.000km shorter than the 6100 km of the A320. Maybe the reason is the C919 has less space available for larger fuel tanks which explains why it is lighter than the A320.
让我难以置信的是C919空载的重量比A320轻,而C919的最大航程略高于4000公里,比A320的6100公里短。也许原因是C919的可用空间更小,油箱更大,这解释了为什么它比A320更轻。
Yulio1988
Its also depends on what engines they use.
这也取决于他们使用什么引擎。
C FeiFei
This can already save them a lot of money, consider how big a market within their own country, 14B people.
这已经可以为他们省下一大笔钱,想想他们有多大的国内市场,14亿人啊。
James chen
I trust Airbus. DO YOU TRUST CHINESE-MADE AIRCRAFT WITH NO FLYING HISTORY? YOU BETTER PRAY HARD!
我相信空客。你信任没有任何飞行历史的中国国产飞机吗?
你最好虔诚祈祷!
Andi Widjaja
What's important is security. Western planes might have backdoor and can be controlled remotely by NATO.
重要的是安全。西方的飞机可能有后门,会被北约远程控制。
Hassan khan
MC-21 is really nice also
MC-21也很不错
Alex H
Both are great replacement of Boeing 737max.
两者都是波音737max的出色替代品。
Alan Luster
R.I.P. 737 Max.
安息吧, 737Max
Liaw johnjohn
don't compare and don't Bull
90% of parts and components are imported to fix together
不要比,90%的零部件都是进口的
Alpha & Omega
Yes it will destroy AIRBUS and BOEING
是的,它会打垮空客和波音
Ben Benito
There is no comparison. China has a long long long way to go.
没有可比性。中国还有很长的路要走。
此文由 三泰虎 编辑,未经允许不得转载!:首页 > 大国 » 中国C919和欧洲A320,谁赢