Chart of the Day: How effective is China's Sinovac vaccine?

每日图表：中国科兴疫苗的有效性如何？

Research shows that three doses of the Sinovac or Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine offer 98-percent protection against severe or fatal outcomes among adults aged 60 years or older, according to a study published in Lancet Infectious Diseases in October, 2022.

根据2022年10月发表在《柳叶刀传染病》杂志上的一项研究，研究表明，科兴公司或辉瑞公司的三剂新冠肺炎疫苗在60岁或以上的成年人中对严重或致命后果提供98%的保护。

研究表明，接种三剂科兴新冠疫苗或辉瑞疫苗，在预防60岁及以上人群的重症和死亡的有效率上均超过了98%，在一项基于在中国香港的约两万例从轻症到危重症的新冠病例的研究中，研究者发现任何一款疫苗的两剂接种，都能为60岁及以上人群提供预防重症和死亡的高水平保护，其中辉瑞的有效率为89.3%，高于科兴的69.9%，而任何一款疫苗的三剂接种，相应的保护率均达到了约98%。另外，总部位于英国的健康数据公司Airfinity去年7月发布的一份报告显示，中国的新冠疫苗，在全球疫苗合作行动的第一年拯救了超过三百万患者的生命。而且这项数据中还没有计入数百万中国境内的患者

以下是youtube上网民的评论：

Discover China
My 105-year-old grandma was vaccinated with China's Sinovac vaccine and infected earlier this month
She is still alive after the infection, and it shows that the vaccine is effective

我105岁的奶奶接种了中国科兴疫苗，本月早些时候被感染

感染后她仍然活着，这表明疫苗是有效的

catonpillow

I would pick Sinovac instead of the U$ mRNA vaccines any day of the week.

我任何时候都会选择接种科兴疫苗，而不是美国的辉瑞疫苗。

mudshovel 289

No you wouldn’t. You happily got whatever was available in your country. You didn’t even ask them if Sinovac was available.

不。国家给你接种什么，你就接种什么。你都没有问他们科兴疫苗是否可用

Bendan Shagua

In Malaysia, the 1st 2 doses were mostly Sinovac because Sinovac is the most available Covid vaccine to develo countries.
When the Malaysian Gov't rolled out Pfizer for the booster, I opted/paid for a Sinovac booster at a private clinic to avoid the unnecessary risk of myocarditis and other known as well as yet unknown side effects.

在马来西亚，前2剂主要是科兴疫苗，因为科兴疫苗是发展中国家最容易获得的新冠疫苗。

当马来西亚政府没有推出辉瑞疫苗时，我选择在一家私人诊所购买科兴疫苗，以避免出现不必要的心肌炎和其他已知但未知的副作用风险。

mudshovel 289

@Bendan Shagua great but most countries didn’t choose that.

很好，但大多数国家都没得选择。

Strong Challenger

Mrna is unsafe. Seriously! It may appear to be effective during the 1st 2 doses, but the side effect is tremendous. You can ask any walking person in Australia. The pain suffered from the side effects are headaches, body aches and fatigue. It's long lasting too!

辉瑞疫苗不安全。前两剂，可能看起来是有效的，但副作用大。你可以问澳大利亚任何一个人。副作用带来的疼痛包括头痛、身体疼痛和疲劳，持续时间很久

Wu Lung

We trust and prefer safer Chinese vaccines

我们信任中国疫苗，更喜欢接种更安全的中国疫苗

Anou

Most Asia countries choose China vaccines over West vaccines

大多数亚洲国家选择中国疫苗，而不是西方疫苗

Sciagurrato

Not Japan or s Korea.

不是选择日本的疫苗，就是韩国的

P Lowe

The best vaccine is the one you have access to.

最好的疫苗是你可以接种得到的疫苗。

Livia Lu

If a piece of news can’t include all the medical researches, it is better to provide a link to the study, or it’s better to interview the researcher. …. It’s actually very hard to convince people because everyone knows that the sample sizes for the studies have been difficult to collect… and viruses are changing…. Thus, probably we already missed the chance for the studies…..

如果新闻不能报道所有的医学研究，最好提供研究的链接，或者最好采访研究者。事实上，很难说服人们，每个人都知道，研究的样本量很难收集。而且病毒正在发生变异。因此，我们可能已经错过了研究的机会。

mudshovel 289

Yeah literally no one else believes this research. This product turned out to be not so great which is why your government began buying others. You guys are working hard to polish it’s reputation.

是的，没有人相信这项研究。结果证明这些疫苗并不是很好，这就是为什么你们的政府开始购买其他疫苗。你们正在努力提高声誉。

Pepeko

@exposingthetruth still Sinovac don't cause heart problems whoops

科兴疫苗不会引起心脏问题

mudshovel 289

@exposingthetruth you people need to learn how to say what you want without getting flagged by the censors.

你们这些人需要学会如何在不被审查的情况下说出自己想要说的话。

mudshovel 289

@AK no it’s just facts. If someone made an inferior product and even they begin to buy other products for their own people then what do you call that? Most countries in the world don’t use this product even if it’s cheaper.

不，这是事实。如果有人造了劣质产品，然而为自己的人购买其他产品，那你怎么说呢？世界上大多数国家都不使用这种产品，即使它价格更便宜。

Wai Moy

FYI, Hong Kong provided other vaccines but mainly China doesn’t

仅供参考，香港提供了其他疫苗，而中国大陆没有

继续阅读：疫苗   辉瑞   科兴   新冠肺炎

此文由 三泰虎 编辑，未经允许不得转载！：首页 > 大国 » 中国科兴疫苗的有效性如何？图表对比辉瑞疫苗