US vetoes UN Security Council action on Israel, Gaza

美国否决联合国安理会巴以局势有关决议

The United States vetoed a United Nations Security Council resolution on Wednesday that would have called for humanitarian pauses in the conflict between Israel and Palestinian Hamas militants to allow humanitarian aid access to the Gaza Strip.

Twelve members voted in favor of the draft text on Wednesday, while Russia and Britain abstained.

10月18日，美国否决了联合国安理会的一项决议，该决议要求暂停以色列和巴勒斯坦哈马斯武装分子之间的冲突，以允许人道主义援助进入加沙地带。

当天，12个成员国对该决议投了赞成票，俄罗斯和英国弃权。

"We are on the ground doing the hard work of diplomacy," U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations, Linda Thomas-Greenfield, told the 15-member council after the vote. "We believe we need to let that diplomacy play out."

"Yes, resolutions are important. And yes, this council must speak out. But the actions we take must be informed by the facts on the ground and support direct diplomacy efforts. That can save lives. The council needs to get this right," she said.

美国驻联合国大使琳达·托马斯·格林菲尔德在投票后对由15个成员国组成的安理会表示：“我们正在实地进行艰苦的外交工作。”。“我们认为，我们需要让这种外交手段发挥作用。”

“是的，决议很重要。是的，安理会必须大声疾呼。但我们采取的行动必须根据当地的事实，并支持直接的外交努力。这可以挽救生命。安理会需要把这件事做好，”她说。

这项决议草案由巴西起草，相关表决在过去的几天里两次被推迟。18日的表决中，12个安理会成员对草案投了赞成票，俄罗斯和英国弃权，美国投了否决票，致使决议未获通过。

以下是各国网友的评论：

charlesmaidoh

The veto powers of the big 5 should be removed in the UNSC and a simple majority rule adopted in its place.

The Americans and to a lesser extent, the Russians use the veto for political purposes when it suits them.

Let eight out of fifteen decide, not one.

联合国安理会应该取消五大常任理事国的否决权，取而代之的是简单多数规则。

美国人，还有俄罗斯人，在合适的时候出于政治目的会动用否决权。

安理会十五个成员国，八个赞成就可以获得通过，而不是让某个国家一票否决

StCharlos

Simply majority? Can you imagine what would happen if passing a bill that one of the big 5 strongly disagree? This is a place for the big 5 making consensus. Unfortunately but any important event can only happen with all of the big 5’s agreement. Not for the others

简单多数？你能想象，一项法案中，如果五大常任理事国有一个强烈反对，后果会是什么吗？安理会是五巨头达成共识的地方。不幸的是，任何重要事件都只有在五巨头达成一致的情况下才能通过

PAlex-iy7xj

The U.S. blocking United Nations resolutions can be seen as both a failure and a success for the UN Security Council.

Failure:
1. Lack of multilateral cooperation: Blocking resolutions undermines the principle of multilateralism, which is crucial for addressing global challenges collectively.
2. Failure to address key global issues: Blocking resolutions may hinder efforts to address pressing issues such as conflicts, human ri hts violations, climate change, and nuclear proliferation.
3. Weakening international norms: The lack of support for resolutions weakens international norms and standards, making it harder to hold nations accountable for their actions.

Success:
1. Sovereignty preservation: By blocking resolutions, the U.S. can ensure it maintains control over its own foreign policy decisions, preserving its sovereignty.
2. Addressing biased resolutions: Some argue that the U.S. blocking certain resolutions may be necessary to counter biased or politically motivated resolutions that undermine its interests or those of its allies.
3. Negotiation leverage: The U.S. can use veto power as a negotiation tool to push for changes in resolutions, ensuring their alignment with U.S. interests and concerns.

Overall, whether the U.S. blocking UN resolutions is seen as a failure or success depends on one's perspective and the specific context of each resolution.

美国阻挠联合国决议可以被视为联合国安理会的失败，也可以被视为成功。

失败：

1.缺乏多边合作：一票否决该决议，破坏了多边主义原则，而多边主义对集体应对全球挑战至关重要。

2. 未能解决关键的全球问题：否决该决议可能会破坏解决冲突、侵犯人*、气候变化和核扩散等紧迫问题的努力。

3. 削弱国际规范：缺乏对决议的支持削弱了国际规范和标准，使各国更难对其行为负责。

成功：

1.维护主权：通过阻止决议，美国可以确保对自己的外交政策决策保持控制，维护主权。

2. 解决有偏见的决议：一些人认为，美国阻止某些决议可能是必要的，以对抗有偏见或出于政治动机的决议

3.谈判筹码：美国可以利用否决权作为谈判工具，推动修改决议，确保其符合美国的利益和关切。

总的来说，美国阻止联合国决议是失败还是成功，取决于一个人的观点和每项决议的具体背景。

RANasution

UNSC should be restructured soon particularly abolishing veto right from permanent members whose use it for their political agenda not for global security.

联合国安理会应该尽快进行重组，特别是取消常任理事国的否决权，那些常任理事国将否决权服务于自身的政治议程，而不是全球安全。

vsevolodsemenov6786

UNSC should be abolished, not restructured.

联合国安理会应该被废除，而不是重组。

rosisimmer5269

I support the veto.

我支持否决权。

mistman5640

US vetoed a bill to condemn Hamas

美国否决了一项谴责哈马斯的法案

StCharlos

It is a problem of US, not a problem of Vetoing

这是美国的问题，而不是否决权的问题

SuperSanic..

as usual USA

像往常一样美国（又否决了）

BenjaminGolding

What about the hostages including the babies?

包括婴儿在内的人质怎么办？

pulseweld

america pays UN's bills!

美国为联合国买单！

talentyin2002

Say the most beautiful words and do the dirtiest things

说最漂亮的话，做最肮脏的事

Michaelwelsch1977

Start the ground invasion

发动地面入侵

Boom
That's seems pretty sad

这似乎很可悲

Dylan

Why would they veto a ceasefire?! That sounds insane.

决议是呼吁停火的，为什么他们要否决！这听起来很疯狂。

DreckUla-BlahBlahBlah

Gaza runs out of water, gaza runs out of feed and medical help, but it seems to never run out of rockets

加沙的水用完了，加沙的食物和医疗援助也用完了，但他们的火箭弹似乎永远用不完的

OscarMike

They ran out of water because the ripped up all their pipes to make bombs. No joke.

他们的水用完了，因为他们把所有的管道都拆了，用来制造炸弹。不是开玩笑的。

Dan Rice

What did the resolution contain?

这个决议包含了哪些内容啊

ian

Cease fire for humanitarian aid

停火，然后进行人道主义援助

Webmiester

Doesn’t surprise me. Not one bit.

我一点也不惊讶。

Eminent Woke

US knows ... what is better for Israel..

美国知道怎么样做对以色列更好。

Bint NOT A SLAVE TO WEF

That’s really how the United Nations works, no matter how many vote yes, the Rothschilds vote is the only one that counts

这就是联合国的运作方式，无论有多少人投了赞成票，罗斯柴尔德家族的选票都是最重要的

Ayaan sohail akram

Shame on the US. Double standards as always. It's a war crime to prevent humanitarian aid.

美国真可耻。一如既往的双重标准。阻止人道主义援助，这是战争罪。

Totally Unprovoked Questions

Does the UN still make sense at all if the nations are least united ever?

如果各国不团结，那么联合国还有意义吗？

Hi I'm Spoopy Pangas

Anybody have the details on what the UN SC resolution was to begin with?

有人知道联合国安理会决议的细节吗？

WCGuy
Wow shocker, not. The UN is useless as usual.

哇塞，震惊了。联合国像往常一样毫无用处。

Xavier.

Useless. The veto power should be scrapped and has no use in the modern age.

无用！否决权应该被废除，在当今世界没有任何用处。

Aly-yay

US never wants peace!!

美国从来就没想要和平

Ryan TreeFiddy v3

No one country should have this much power over the world.

不能让一个国家在世界上拥有如此强大的权力。

The Doctor and Rose Tyler in the TARDIS

No country should have veto power

任何国家都不应该拥有否决权

Giulio Wells #FreeAssange

Expel the usa from the UN.

将美国逐出联合国。

继续阅读：安理会   否决   联合国

此文由 三泰虎 编辑，未经允许不得转载！：首页 > 大国 » 巴西起草的巴以局势有关决议，安理会12个成员国赞成，俄英弃权，美国一票否决，各国网友的评论