Modi is setting a benchmark that is very very high for future PMs…Is that good or bad?  What if we judge the future PMs on the same standards set by Modi and then find them wanting?  Will there be a stage of chaos?

莫迪为未来的印度总理树立了一个非常非常高的标杆，这是好事还是坏事？如果我们用莫迪的标准来评判未来的总理，却发现找不到合适的人选？印度会出乱子吗？

以下是Quora网友的评价：

Shyam Sunder Lal

What good benchmark you are talking about?

Undoubtedly Narendra Modi is a popular Prime Minister and he could get elected twice and now trying for his third term.

But Narendra Modi government has been very controversial on multiple counts.

你所谓的很高的标杆是什么样的？

毋庸置疑，纳伦德拉·莫迪是一位受欢迎的总理，他已经连任两次，现在正在冲刺第三个任期。

但纳伦德拉·莫迪政府在很多领域都引发了极大争议。

Let's examine his progress report for last ten years.

Narendra Modi government focused on hard infrastructure development such as Railways. airports.sea transport. Road and Highways.

In spending on these projects it went out of way much beyond its financial capacity.

He made RBI to pay huge money to the government.

It borrowed heavily from the market. Union government debt has gone up to Rs 205 lakh crores which is nearly equivalent to size of GDP. IMF has warned India that its National Debt is equivalent to size of GDP which is dangerous for India.

让我们来看看他最近十年的工作报告。

莫迪政府很重视铁路等硬基础设施的发展，比如机场、海洋运输、道路和高速公路。

印度政府在这些项目上的支出远远超出了自己的财政能力。

莫迪让印度储备银行为印度政府支付巨额资金。

印度政府从市场上大量借贷。联邦政府的债务已经上升到205万亿卢比，几乎相当于印度GDP的规模。国际货币基金组织已经警告印度，称印度国家债务已相当于GDP的规模，这对印度来说十分危险。

Besides National Highways Authority had taken Debt which are far beyond it capacity to repay. Government has prevented it not to borrow from market.

As per reports Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman had said that Railways will now be funded by the Sovereign funds only. that means Railways have been prevented to borrow from market.

As of now servicing cost is 45 percent of the tax revenue of the government. which is very high.

Is this a good benchmark for future Prime Ministers ?

此外，印度公路局的债务已经远远超出其偿还能力。印度政府已经拒绝它继续从市场上借款了。

据报道，财政部长希塔拉曼曾表示，印度铁路现在只能由印度主权基金提供资金。这意味着铁路公司也无法从市场上借款了。

目前，服务费用已占到政府税收的45%，比例非常高。

对未来的印度总理来说，这是一个好的标杆吗？

Secondly Modi government has too many failed projects which had adversely affected economic growth.

For example Make in India program which was a flag ship program of Modi government. but it had to be abandoned midway.

Let's examine what happened?

Make in India was announced by the Prime Minister in September 2014.

There were three objectives.

To attract foreign investors in manufacturing to increase goods for exports.

To increase manufacturing to GDP ratio to 25 percent.

To create 20 million additional jobs every year.

To ensure it happens government focused on Ease of Doing Business and could attain good rankings.

其次，莫迪政府实施了太多失败的项目，对经济增长产生了不利影响。

例如，“印度制造”是莫迪政府的重点项目，但已经夭折。

让我们来看看发生了什么？

2014年9月，印度总理宣布推动“印度制造”。

这个项目有三个目标。

吸引外商投资印度制造业，增加出口商品。

将制造业占GDP的比重提高到25%。

每年新增2000万个就业岗位。

为了确保这一目标的实现，印度政府将工作重点放在提升营商环境的便利度上，希望获得更好的排名。

Second it proposed Land Acquisition Bill which was opposed by Political Parties and was withdrawn by the government.

Thus ended a flag ship program and a program which would have redeemed Narendra Modi pledge to create two crores jobs every year.

Let me share one more example. Privatization program was announced with big hype but during last nine years only one company got Privatized that is. AIR INDIA only.

Is this benchmark Narendra Modi is proposing for next generation of Prime Ministers?

第二，印度提出了土地征用法案，但遭到了政党的反对，印度政府被迫取消。

因此，印度政府的重点项目和一个可以兑现纳伦德拉·莫迪每年创造2000万个就业岗位承诺的项目就都付诸东流了。

我再分享一个案例吧。印度政府大张旗鼓地宣传私有化计划，但在过去9年间，只有一家公司完成了私有化—那就是印度航空。

这就是纳伦德拉·莫迪为下一任印度总理订立的标杆吗？

Of course Narendra Modi has set up a benchmark which I don't think future Prime Minister should follow?

What is this benchmark?

Politicking.

That means doing public administration on the basis of political affiliations.

Let's take two examples to illustrate.

PM Modi is totally biased with regard to offense made by opposition or his own Party men.

For example Narendra Modi charged NCP leadership with thousands of crores corruption by Ajit Pawar of NCP and within a week Ajit Pawar joins BJP. every thing is forgotten. And Ajit Pawar was swarn in as Deputy Chief Minister of Maharastra and given charge of Finance Portfolio.

当然，纳伦德拉·莫迪订立了一个标杆，但我认为未来的印度总理并不需要效仿。

这个标杆是什么？

政治活动。

这意味着他是站在政治立场的基础上进行公共管理的。

让我们举两个例子来说明。

莫迪总理对反对派或人民党内成员的过错非常不公。

例如，纳伦德拉·莫迪指控全国大公党领导人阿吉特·帕瓦尔贪污数万亿卢比，一周内阿吉特·帕瓦尔加入了人民党。一切指控都销声匿迹了。阿吉特·帕瓦尔被任命为马哈拉施特拉邦副首席部长，负责财政管理。

Another example.

Rahul Gandhi was sentenced to two years imprisonment and his position of Member of Parliament was withdrawn within 24 hours and he has to lose his bungalow also.

In another case a BJP Member of Parliament from Gujarat was sentenced to two years of imprisonment but he was allowed time to appeal right upto Supreme Court but no action was initiated by the Speaker of Lok sabha.

再举一个例子。

拉胡尔·甘地被判处两年监禁，他的国会议员身份在24小时内就被撤销了，他的别墅也被没收。

但在另一起案件中，一名来自古吉拉特邦人民党的议员被判处两年监禁，但他有时间向最高法院提出上诉，下议院议长对此没有采取任何行动。

What was crime of above MP ?

Above Member of Parliament went to a Government hospital and one of his supporter went to the Doctor that said that MP wants to meet him. but since Doctor was busy with a medical emergency. he said he will come later. Concerned MP was furious and when Doctor went to see him. MP slapped him.

Doctor went to police and ultimately MP was punished for two years imprisonment. but the Union government and Lok Sabha Speaker allowed him to seek legal remedies.

In preface of our constitution provides for equality before law. but Government led by Narendra Modi is completely violating this constitutional provisions.

Therefore I believe No future Prime Ministers should follow such benchmark

这位议员犯了什么罪？

这位议员去到了一家公立医院，他的支持者找到医生说议员想见他。当时这位医生正忙着处理急诊，就说他晚点过去。议员勃然大怒，见到医生时，扇了医生一巴掌。

医生去了警察局，最终MP被判入狱两年。但联邦政府和人民院议长允许他寻求法律补救。

我们印度宪法的序言规定了法律面前人人平等，但纳伦德拉·莫迪领导的印度政府完全违反了宪法的规定。

因此，我认为未来的印度总理不该遵循这样的标准。

Mohan Prakash

Who cares??

The voters in Karnataka, delhi , Punjab knowingly vote parties for self appeasement…..why do they care about nation et all?

The crooks in this de ocracy deserves PMs they get.

谁在乎呢? ?

卡纳塔克邦、德里、旁遮普的选民故意投票给不作为的政党.....他们为什么要关心国家？

这个皿煮国家的骗子也就只配有这样的总理。

Pradeep Bhasme

If a person of morality ethics scruples dignity and conscience is to become the PM of India then he will steer clear of modi’s lofty standards and avoid the chaos you are predicting however alternatively if the replacement follows the lofty standards ( pun intended) then there can be chaos.

如果一个有道德有操守、有尊严有良知的人成为印度总理，那么他就能避开莫迪的“高标准”，让国家免受你预测到的混乱之苦，但如果继任者遵循莫迪的“高标准”，那么印度就会真的出乱子了。

Anil Garg

Modi is doing what he feels is right,

If the future PMs are found wanting

it will be bad for them

as well as India.

莫迪在做自己认定正确的事，

如果未来的印度总理不能让民众满意，

这对他们不利，

对印度也不利。

Rajan Silwal

Assessing political leaders and setting high standards can have both positive and negative consequences. On the positive side, setting a high benchmark encourages leaders to strive for excellence, effective governance, and accountability. It can lead to positive reforms and improvements in various sectors.

However, it's essential to consider a few factors:

考核政治领导人、制定高标准既有积极的影响，也有消极的影响。从积极的方面来看，设定一个高标准可以鼓励领导人追求卓越、有效的治理，推行问责制，还可以引领各个部门进行积极的改革和进步。

我们要考虑以下几个因素:

1. **Diverse Perspectives:** Different individuals have diverse perspectives on political leadership. What one person considers a high standard, another may view differently. Public opinion varies, and it's challenging to create a universally accepted benchmark.

2. **Changing Contexts:** Political challenges and contexts evolve over time. Standards that apply in one era may need adjustments based on the specific circumstances faced by future leaders.

1. 不同的看法：不同的人对政治领导人有不同的看法。一个人认为的高标准，另一个人可能并不认同。公众意见因人而异，很难形成一个能被普遍接受的标准。

2. **不断变化的环境：**政治挑战和环境随着时间的推移而演变。适合过去的标准可能需要根据未来领导者面临的具体国情进行调整。

3. **Potential for Unfair Comparisons:** Setting exceptionally high standards may lead to unfair comparisons and unrealistic expectations. No leader is without flaws, and evaluating successors based on an idealized benchmark may lead to dissatisfaction.

4. **Adaptability and Innovation:** Political leadership involves addressing evolving challenges. A rigid adherence to past benchmarks may hinder leaders from implementing innovative solutions to new and emerging issues.

3. **不公平对比的可能：**设定过高的标准可能会导致不公平的对比和不切实际的期望。没有完美的领导人，用过于理想化的标准来评估继任者可能会导致不满。

4. **适应性和创新：**政治领导人需要解决不断变化的挑战。严格拘泥于过去的标准可能会妨碍领导人对新问题实施创新的解决方案。

While holding leaders to high standards is important for accountability, it's crucial to allow flexbility and adaptation to changing circumstances.

If future leaders are judged solely on the standards set by their predecessors, there is a risk of dissatisfaction and potential chaos. It's essential for society to appreciate the nuances of governance, recognize efforts to address challenges, and engage in informed discussions rather than relying solely on comparisons to a set benchmark.

虽然用高标准要求领导人很重要，但灵活性和适应不断变化的环境的能力也至关重要。

如果仅仅根据前任制定的标准来评判未来的领导人，就有可能引发不满和潜在动乱。印度社会必须学会欣赏不同领导人的细微差别，意识到应对挑战需要付出的努力，并参与有意义的讨论，不要只是依赖既定标准进行比较。

Sivaraman Jayaraman

You are absolutely right

The benchmark now is set very high

Obituary now for the entitled Dynast Parties

India has the best talents available even in politics who will rise up to be future PMs - any given time they could scale up the ladder

你说的完全正确。

现在的标准定得太高了

现在是《王朝政党》的讣告

印度拥有最优秀的人才，政界也不例外，他们会成长为未来的总理—在一定时间内，他们都可以拾级而上。

Karthik

No that is not possible for the future PM because they will be busy at work and they won't find time for leisure trips around the world and modeling photoshoots

不，这对未来的总理来说是不可能的，因为他们只能疲于工作，根本没有时间在世界各地休闲旅行、拍照留恋。

Cicada 3303

Both.

Good for the country.

Bad for the people who have personal goals or aspirations above the country.

有好有坏。

对国家有好处。

但对那些把个人利益置于国家之上的人来说，这就是坏事一桩。

Gaurav

Is Modi ruling India better?

Please read my answer. Live experience.

My dad is GM in a tractor company, he had visited a very remote village in UP for testing.

What he saw was incredible,

The toilets construction as promised on independence day had already began and the internet connection was almost put up in the community center of the village.

The villagers said:"what the PM said on independence day is now getting converted into reality and they were really happy to see the action so fast"

莫迪执政印度，成绩更好吗？

请看我的回答。亲身经历。

我爸爸是一家拖拉机公司的总经理，他去北方邦一个非常偏远的村庄进行测试。

他看到的情景令人不敢相信，

正如独立日上所承诺的那样，当地已经开始修建厕所，村里的社区中心也几乎都通了互联网。

村民们说：“总理在独立日说的话已经变成了现实，我们很高兴看到政府的行动如此神速。”

Umarao Upadhyay

Will Modi make it difficult for coming PMs to match his standard and quality of work?

Modi is setting a standard to be followed by future PMs. Questioner is right in his observation about future PMs facing difficulty,if they fail to follow the standard set by Modi.It is not just the personal life which Modi is leading, but also his way of working, his tremendous control on over all governance,despite pulls and pressures from different directions, are also the matters of anxety for others who follow him closely.

Having no interest in worldly matters,kee away from family,total devotion to the cause of the nation,these are some of the aspects of his character,which are realy the matters of research for the social scientists.How can a man be so indifferent to his personal comforts,while doing service to the nation?

莫迪会让未来的印度总理难以达到他目前的工作标准和质量吗？

莫迪为未来的印度总理树立了一个标准。提问者的观察是正确的，如果未来的印度总理不遵循莫迪设定的标准，他们就会陷入困境。莫迪引领的不仅是个人生活方式，莫迪的工作方式，莫迪对政府事务的掌控（虽然也面临各方势力的重重压力），都会让他的继任者感到焦虑。

莫迪对世俗事物不感兴趣，远离家人，完全献身于国家事业，这些是他性格的一些方面，这是社会科学家需要研究的问题。一个人在为国家服务时，怎么会如此不在乎自己的个人生活呢？