中国运-20和美国波音C17的性能对比，谁更强

Comparison of China's Y 20 and American Boeing c17

中国运-20 VS 美国波音C17

运-20的机身长度为47米，翼展50米，已经大于常规商业飞机。C-17的机身长度达到53米

运-20的最大起飞重量为220吨，载重为66吨，最大航程为7800公里，时速为800公里。C-17的最大起飞重量为265吨，载重为77吨，最大航程为11000公里，时速为940公里。

运-20使用了4台涡扇-20发动机，这是中国自主研制的一款高推力涡扇发动机，具有良好的可靠性和经济性。C-17使用了4台F117-PW-100发动机，这是美国普惠公司生产的一款军用涡扇发动机，也是B-2“幽灵”轰炸机的动力来源。两种发动机都属于世界先进水平

以下是外国网友的评论：

wenling3487

The key advantage of Y20 is its fuselage demonstration

So its cost is much lower

运-20的关键优势在于它的机身，所以它的成本要低得多

hellocatIII

If you go to see the five generation aircraft of South Korea and Türkiye, why does no one say they are copied from the United States? In addition, the sixth generation aircraft of the United States have duck wings, can it be said that they are plagiarizing China's J-20?

去看看韩国和土耳其的五代机，为什么没有人说它们是仿制美国的？另外，美国的第六代机都有鸭翼，是不是可以说是抄袭了中国的歼-20?

saleem956ify

Oh look the Y20 has 2 wings, landing gear, and 4 engines... its stolen technology.

看，运-20有2个机翼，1个起落架和4个引擎…这不就是偷来的技术嘛。

manwingchi9156

A car have window, wheel, window, engine, roof, door, China steal US technology.

汽车有窗户、轮子、窗户、引擎、车顶、门，中国偷了美国的技术。

YenzikovALCherasLegend

Of course US Air Force is better as USA had been at War up to this current time. USA air froce had done millions of bombings and transported billions of ton amory . Chinese Fighter and Bomber had yet to fire , bomb anything nor had a kill .

USA is specialized in Killing Machines and is a War Expert. There is nothing strange for US to mock anyone who don't tow their line be it about Geopolitic , Trade , Climate .whatever you think of you get it.

美国空军当然更强，美国到目前为止一直处于战争状态。美国空军进行了数百万次轰炸，运送了数十亿吨军火。中国战斗机和轰炸机都还没有开过火，没轰炸过别人，也没有炸死过人。

美国擅长制造杀人机器，是战争专家。美国嘲笑那些在地缘政治、贸易、气候等问题上不跟随他们的人，这没什么奇怪的。

zenden9

Y20 has super critical structure wing while C17 has none becos it design is much earlier.

运-20有超临界结构机翼，而C17由于设计较早，所以没有。

nanymitert5447

In 2025 when the M10-Booker Mobile FirePower (MFP) Vehicles are needed by the U.S. infantry, this C17 will be handy to carry two of these M10 MFP to be ready for the close combat land forces.

2025年，当美国步兵需要M10-布克移动火力(MFP)车辆时，C17可以方便携带两辆M10 MFP，为近距离作战的地面部队做好准备。

jjman533

Is the Y20 made out of scrap elevator and escalator parts?

运-20是用废弃的电梯和自动扶梯的部件制造的吗?

Utube1024

The difference China produce themselves. India need to toe the line and beg in order to buy them.

区别在于中国的运20运输机是自己造的。印度需要言听计从，苦苦乞求才能买到。

user-pv2vv8fh1p

Y20, looks more better than C17. Great China.

运-20看起来比C17好，中国真牛。

anthonytran7566

C17 is being copied from China Y20?????

C17是抄袭了中国运-20？

nelson2020

C17 used for war, Y20 used for peace - the difference

C17用于参战，运-20用于维护和平——这就是区别

sebastien3351

The Y-20 is not as well suited for long range to support "power projection" as well as the C-17. I would like to know more about the Y-20s ability to land on rough landing strips.

运-20不像C-17那样适合远距离支持“力量投射”。我想进一步了解运-20在简易跑道上降落的能力。

markkeister6057

Does the y20 have in flight refueling as the c17? Makes the fuel comparison mute.

运-20和C-17一样有空中加油功能吗？燃油比较静音。

jesuscervantesj82

It's obvious a C-17 in my opinion is superior. It's a war machine in the sense of it carrying war vehicles and supplies. It also offers the ability to get penetrated by a boom and refilled in mid-air so that could be considered unlimited range. I find the C-17 much better in my opinion.

在我看来，C-17显然更好。从运载战争车辆和物资上说，它是一架战争机器。它还有空中加油的能力，因此可以被认为是无限航程。我觉得C-17更好。

jimmyyoh8144

The fact of the matter is where are the US C-17 to be deployed from where. The answer is from US homeland to Pacific east region is 10,000 km away. The Chinese Y-20 from their homebases to Eastern Sea targets in 1,000 km. Thus, Y-20 can fly back and forth a number of trips vs C-17 to fly 1 time. LoL.

问题的关键是美国C-17从哪里出动。答案是从美国本土到太平洋东部地区，有1万公里远。中国运-20从他们的基地到东海目标的距离为1000公里。因此，运-20可以来回飞行多次，而C-17只飞行1次，哈哈。

Nagpadawala

You have not mentioned anything of the most important comparision. The RELIABILITY of the Y 20. Is it like most chinese equipment . Totally crap.

你没有提到最重要一点区别，运-20的可靠性，它和大多数中国装备一样，全是废物。

jkp2712

Americans have that big of a plane to move tanks. The Chinese have that big of plane to evacuate fatalities from a conflict with US.

美国人有这么大的飞机来运坦克。在与美国发生冲突时，中国人有这么大的飞机疏散人员。

kannankrishnan4333

ORIGINAL vs FAKE or Clone

原创 vs 假冒/山寨货

glennoc8585

I hope the QC is better than most chinese goods. In saying that Boeing is not great

我希望它的质量控制比大多数中国货好。但波音也没那么好

balongride3169

As usual it's xerox copy of the design from US military aircraft

一如既往，抄袭了美国军用飞机的设计

xushenxn

No need to compare, since C17 is no longer in production. Maybe US will replace them in next 30 years, nobody knows.

没必要比较，因为C17已经停产了。也许美国将在未来30年替换它们。

elijahwakati8639

It’s not a full copy they made some small/changes

不是纯抄袭，他们做了一些小的改动

Leti86

So pretty much what I have learned from this video is that China just wait until the USA invent something and they just steal it. lol

我从中了解到的是，中国就等美国发明某种技术，然后就直接偷过来，哈哈

dennislao7406

defend scs from foreign invaders

保护南海不受外国侵略者入侵

RamZar50

C-17 has customers in U.S., U.K., Canada, Australia, Qatar, UAE, Kuwait, India.

Y-20 is only used by PRC.

Even though C-17 has been out of production since 2015 it has no competition.

C-17的客户包括美国、英国、加拿大、澳大利亚、卡塔尔、阿联酋、科威特和印度。

运-20只有中国用。

尽管C-17自2015年以来已经停产，但它没有竞争对手。

haumvaj5065

U S's more better and look nicer

美国的C17强多了，也更好看

xzdrtxyzxvn

Look careful at C17, workmanship very bad, very rough work like back yard workshop. Look at Y20, smooth skin and great workmanship. Y20 is more beautiful thsn C17... C17 is crude in making..

仔细看C17，做工很差，很粗糙，像小作坊造的。再看运-20，机身流畅，做工精良。运-20比C17更好看，C17的做工很粗糙…

robertfrauenthal4713

Since the Chinese are 'great' at hacking/copying is the Y20 an 'upgraded' copy of the C17?

中国人擅长黑客/复制，运-20就是C17的升级版吧?

iigoofywebsterii

The fvkery about this is that China stole blueprints and designs to make the Y 20. looks identical to the C 17 Globemaster

中国偷了蓝图和设计来造运- 20，看起来和C17环球霸王一模一样

mwitarijob1557

Y20 can't match the magesty of c27. Its a clone.

运-20无法与c17匹敌，它是山寨的。

user-xv5tz1cl5y

You want to buy Chinese JUNK? Good luck