China Dominates World Shipbuilding in 2024 | Market Share Increased To 58.1% of the World's Ships
2024年中国主导世界造船业,全球船舶市场份额升至58.1%
以下是外国网友的评论:
lordlee6473
China just signed a deal with Qatar for a whole lot of LNG ships. China is the only country that can build super carrier, LNG ship and ocean cruises, the three most complex ships to build. No other country comes even close.
中国刚刚与卡塔尔签署了一项协议,为卡塔尔建造大批LNG滚装船。中国是唯一能够建造超级航母、LNG滚装船和远洋游轮的国家,这是建造工艺最复杂的三种船舶。没有其他国家能与之相提并论。
peterelliott2914
China is the world's largest importer and the world's largest exporter. An example would be their ro-ro ships. Because they've recently become the world's largest exporter of cars they're building a bunch of ships to carry them and wharves to load them. Cosco has ordered 24 new ships for this and they'll be built by the end of this year. Chinese shipbuilding is demand driven and Chinese shipyards are the only ones that can meet the demand.
中国是世界上最大的进口国和出口国。他们的滚装船就是一个例子。他们最近已经成为世界上最大的汽车出口国,所以他们正在建造一堆运载汽车的轮船和装载汽车的码头。中远为此订购了24艘新船,这些船将于今年年底建造。中国造船业是需求驱动的,中国造船厂是唯一能够满足这些需求的。
user-bt8vn3dj6o
The industrial base of China is impressive.
中国的工业基础令人印象深刻。
cmartinmnl
The big difference isn't cheap labor or subsidies. It's now more on automation and a efficient supply system. Also as for quality same quality comes out of all countries! Owners has a specific requirement which has to be met.
最大的区别不是廉价劳动力或补贴,现在更多是自动化和高效的供应系统。至于质量,所有国家的质量都一样,必须满足买方的要求。
khurramshahzad694
If you just look at the quality of ships they are building it becomes apparent that they are world leaders not only in manufacturing capacity but also in innovative technology. The world’s first nuclear powered container ship running on an innovative Thorium reactor was announced few months back! Even BYD a battery and EV company has its own RORO ships running on LNG! And the first battery powered container ship has been launched!
看看他们正在建造的船舶的质量,就会发现他们不仅在制造能力方面,而且在创新技术方面都是世界领先的。
几个月前,世界上第一艘以创新钍反应堆为动力的核动力集装箱船宣布问世!
就连比亚迪也有自己的LNG滚装船!第一艘电池驱动的集装箱船已经下水了!
krispypriest5116
As a WW2 nut and some basic understanding about logistics (war/economy), the USA was pum out a Destroyer/escorts every 7 days (175 units/32 months) and cargo' (2,700 Liberty!!) ships.
China is rising (JUST like the USA/WW2) and well it's going to get interesting.
作为一个二战迷,对后勤(战争/经济)有一些基本的了解,美国每7天就会下水一艘驱逐舰/护卫舰和货船
中国正在崛起(就像二战时的美国一样),世界局势将变得有趣。
onecanmadman
A couple of years ago i was on a newbuild LNG carrier built by CSSC china, I was expecting a disaster but actually the build quality was ok... overall pretty much the same as korean...
几年前,我坐在中国中船建造的一艘新建造的LNG运输船上,我以为会发生灾难,但实际上建造质量还不错…总体上和韩国的差不多…
JK-zw8ec
China is also the world's largest producer of steel.
中国也是世界上最大的钢铁生产国。
Buhayamerica658
Sal, the IMO's GHG emissions targets were changed more than a year ago to net-zero in 2050, from the previous 50% reduction you mentioned, in order to more closely align with the Paris agreement.
在一年多前,国际海事组织的温室气体排放目标从之前的减少50%改为到2050年实现净零排放,以便更紧密地与巴黎协议保持一致。
yu-jd5jg
How to beat a country that is building quality ships, competitive prices, fast delivery, and financial support?
如何击败一个建造高质量船舶、价格有竞争力、能快速交货且有财政支持的国家?
erich623
There is an automation push in the Chinese shipbuilding market, it would be an interesting topic to discuss in the context of other big shipbuilding countries.
中国造船市场正在推动自动化,这将是一个有趣的话题。
edc1569
Congrats to China
祝贺中国
gregbluefinstudios4658
One doesn't have to memorize all the numbers, to see TRENDS. And the TRENDS have some pretty big global, as well as NATIONAL strategic implications, for us here locally. Shame that the powers that be, cannot see that as well.
不需要记住所有的数字,就能看明白趋势。这些“趋势”对全球和各个国家都有重要的战略影响。遗憾的是,当权者看不到这一点。
joefin5900
Boston and NYC have the facilities, but do they have the skilled labor to build ships? When building the Freedom Tower, we had to get welders qualified to AWS D1.5 from all over the country.
波士顿和纽约有造船厂,但他们有熟练的造船工人吗?在建造自由塔的时候,我们不得不从全国各地找到符合AWS D1.5标准的焊工。
keinaanabdi6821
Damn! China is completing 7 ships per day every day of the week!
该死的,中国每天都能建造7艘船!
georgewest2096
Simply stated, we really need to grow or we will die. As far as world ship is conmcernned.
简单地说,就造船业而言,我们真的需要发展,否则我们就会被淘汰。
GM4ThePeople
The Yen has weakened yuge (vs. the Dollar) since the Cooftime, the Won less so, & the Yuan less than that. At some point (soon?), the Japanese loss of market share to China may turn around.
日元(对美元)自1990年代以来大幅贬值,韩元贬值幅度较小,人民币贬值幅度更小。在某一时刻(很快?),日本失去的市场份额可能会被中国扭转。
caynehampton1878
We still have the Philly Shipyard around here, but it does not produce the number of ships like in China, South Korea, and Japan, and are built here for the US Merchant Marine.
我们的费城造船厂仍在,但它不像中国、韩国和日本那样生产舰船,而是建造商船。
dawner84
The interest rate hikes in the United States in recent years have led to Japan and South Korea also raising interest rates, which has had a great impact on industries such as shipbuilding companies that borrow huge amounts of money. China is indeed one of the few countries to cut interest rates, which has created a cost advantage.
近年来,随着美国加息,日本和韩国也纷纷提高了利率,这对造船企业等借入巨额资金的行业产生了很大的影响。中国确实是少数几个降息的国家之一,这创造了成本优势。
JoanneLeon
We need to invest seriously in shipbuilding again. Hope some Congressfolk are listening
我们需要重新认真投资造船业,希望一些国会议员有在听。
LunarGlow92
China has almost completely automated ship building factories that are close to running lights off. Its pretty fascinating yet terrifying to watch.
中国的造船厂几乎完全自动化,几乎要超过光速了。非常有吸引力,但看起来很可怕。
JohnTBlock
What kind of engine burns ammonia? That's new to me...didn't know it could combust!!
什么样的发动机能燃烧氨气?这对我来说很新鲜,不知道它能燃烧
annamarie5372
Gone is Korean ships and old day Greek shippers
韩国船和旧的希腊船已经消失了
user-on3ie9uv3x
If you consider the four key factors of manufacturing: people, methods, capital, and markets, then you can easily predict that China is a potential leader in any product as long as the product is deemed by the chinese to be of great significance to the national economy. Simply put, if a product is not protected by patents (and therefore subject to sanctions barriers from some countries), it will be produced in China, better and cheaper.
考虑到制造业的四个关键因素:人、方法、资本和市场,可以很容易地预测,只要产品被中国认为对国民经济有重要意义,中国就是一个潜在的领导者。
简单地说,如果一种产品不受专利保护(因此受到某些国家的制裁壁垒),它将在中国生产,质量更好,价格更低。
johnzmuzic
A lot of European Ro Ro ferry operators are designing and then supervising construction in China , because the build is cheaper there .
许多欧洲滚装船运营商在中国进行设计,然后监督建造过程,因为那里的建造成本更低。
matthewpatnaude8905
How explosive are ammonia loaded ships?
装载氨的船有多易爆?
JohnTBlock
Can you point to any difference in build quality/ lifespan between Korea/Japan, vs. Chinese built vessels? Just curious...
你能指出韩国、日本和中国建造的船只在建造质量和寿命上有什么不同吗?只是好奇…
CSIS25
Lets hope the front don't fall off
希望前面不要脱落
Paul-H-Wolfram6608
That's the reason why today's China is able to built those huge naval aircraft carriers, amphibious assault ships, submarines and those naval destroyers, frigates, littoral combat ships, cruiser and patrol ships for their territorial water defense.
这就是为什么今天的中国能够建造那些巨大的海军航母、两栖攻击舰、潜艇,以及海军驱逐舰、护卫舰、濒海战斗舰、巡洋舰和巡逻舰来保卫他们的领海。
khurramshahzad694
Every government including Japan Korea and USA give direct and indirect subsidies to their industries in areas where they want to compete . For example USA gave huge subsidies to Tesla during Obama period and more recently huge subsidies are being handed out for setting up semiconductor manufacturing plants in USA! Why blame China ! Why not give subsidies to shipbuilding in USA where shipyards are struggling to stay afloat and US government though providing cheap land and electricity to them is trying to fail the smaller yards so that they can give government contracts to big companies! Small yards like SwiftShips payments are being held up and the century old yard is struggling while for the same contract Austal is being paid twice! Is that China’s fault? Get your own house in order! Promote SME that produce things and stop rewarding financial sector, the stock exchanges, the hedge funds, the investment banks, Wall Street leeches and the software companies like Apple, Facebook, Microsoft etc who can buy politicians and government officials for favourable policies!
包括日本、韩国和美国在内的各国政府都在他们想要竞争的领域给他们的产业提供直接和间接的补贴。
例如,美国在奥巴马时期向特斯拉提供了巨额补贴,最近又向在美国建立半导体制造工厂提供了巨额补贴!为什么要责怪中国!为什么不给美国的造船业提供补贴,因为美国的造船厂正在努力维持运营,美国政府虽然向他们提供廉价的土地和电力,却试图让较小的造船厂倒闭,这样他们就可以把政府合同给大公司!
像SwiftShips这样的小船厂的付款被搁置了,百年老船厂也在挣扎,而同样的合同,奥斯塔却被付了两次款!这是中国的错吗?
把你自己家的事情管好!促进生产产品的中小企业,停止奖励金融部门、证券交易所、对冲基金、投资银行、华尔街公司和苹果、Facebook、微软等软件公司,他们可以收买政客和政府官员以获得优惠政策!