052D型隐形驱逐舰，中国海军力量的崛起

Type 052D Stealth Destroyer: Rise of Chinese Naval Power

052D型隐形驱逐舰：中国海军力量的崛起

A key enabler behind the rise of China's PLA Navy is the Type 052D stealth destroyers, designed for anti-air warfare but also have good capabilities in anti-ship and anti-submarine warfare.

中国海军崛起背后的一个关键推动者是052D型隐形驱逐舰，设计用于防空作战，但也具备良好的反舰和反潜作战能力！

以下是外国网友的评论：

GeoPoliticsCommentry

“The Bear does not concern itself with the opinion of the Sheep”.

“The Dragon does not concern itself with the opinion of the Sheep”.

Blinken is an Empty sheep, Yellen is an Old sheep , Ursula is a Sheep in Tatters.

"熊不在乎羊的意见"

"龙不在乎羊的意见"

布林肯是只绵羊，耶伦是只老羊，厄休拉是只破残缺的羊。

winbear7423

Has anyone noticed that an American Constellation-class frigate will cost as much as two Type 055s combined while having firepower inferior to the Type 054B? And an Arleigh Burke-class destroyer costs the same as 4 Type 052Ds while its firepower is far inferior to the Type 055

有没有人注意到，一艘美国星座级护卫舰的成本相当于两艘055型护卫舰的总和，但火力却不如054B型？一艘阿利·伯克级驱逐舰的成本与4艘052D型相同，而火力远不如055型

daveh5947

No wonder the Office Boy Blinken was scared when he visited!

难怪办公室勤杂工布林肯来访时感到害怕!

baiyanxe2475

This medium-sized destroyer is better than Arleigh Burke 3. The United States has only installed active phased array radar on the Arleigh Burke 3, but China has popularized active phased array radar several years ago, and even their close defense guns are equipped with active phased array radars. This technology is already very cheap for them, and the United States is still spending several times as much money to build Arleigh Burke class. If you want to say who is better between 055 and Arleigh Burke, I think it's like F22 and F16. The generation difference will make the other side powerless to fight back.

这艘中型驱逐舰比阿利伯克3型更好。

美国在“阿利·伯克3”上只安装了有源相控阵雷达，而中国在几年前就已经普及了有源相控阵雷达，甚至连他们的近防炮都配备了有源相控阵雷达。

这项技术对他们来说已经非常便宜了，美国花了好几倍的钱建造阿利伯克级。

如果你想问055和阿利·伯克谁更好，我觉得就像拿F22和F16比，代差会让对方无力反击。

phils4634

China can build these faster than the US, and repair them faster too. If the US's statement of "War with China in 2025" comes to fruition, this will be an important factor. Of course, China can (and does) produce the weapons these boats carry "in considerable volume" which will also be a deciding factor, should circumstances require it.

中国的建造速度比美国快，维修速度也比美国快。如果美国宣称的“2025年与中国开战”成为现实，这将是一个重要因素。

当然，如果情况需要，中国能够(而且确实)生产这些军舰携带的武器，“数量可观”，这也是一个决定性因素。

verypleasantguy

Looks like Indonesia may want to purchase 052D in the near future

看起来印尼可能想在不久的将来购买052D

baiyanxe2475

Correct a mistake: the naval gun of 052 is not based on ak130. It is more like a Western naval gun, which is said to combine the advantages of Italian Otto series naval guns and Russian naval guns, optimize the loading performance, and is an upgraded version of them. It should also be noted that the 9-meter vertical launching system can hold four small and medium-sized missiles per hole, or large missiles like the hhq9/yj21. So don't underestimate the number of missiles it can carry.

纠正一个错误：052的舰炮不是基于ak130的，它更像是一门西方舰炮，据说结合了意大利奥托系列舰炮和俄罗斯舰炮的优点，优化了装填性能，是它们的升级版。

还应该指出的是，9米垂直发射系统每孔可以容纳四枚小型和中型导弹，或者像hhq9/yj21这样的大型导弹。所以不要低估它能携带的导弹数量。

redblueyankee8343

China's strength is the pride of our Sinosphere, no matter what anyone says I will always support my Sinosphere brothers

中国的实力是我们汉文化圈的骄傲，不管别人怎么说，我永远支持我的汉文化圈兄弟

bradgolding6847

The big difference between western and Chinese/Russian warships is, Russian and Chinese shipyards build ships for purpose, whereas, in the west, shipyards build for profit.

Tell USNI, the PLAN does not pose a "naval threat," it poses a naval capability. Only the western navies pose a threat.

Another excellent video ENI, thank you.

西方军舰和中国/俄罗斯军舰之间的最大区别是，俄罗斯和中国的造船厂建造军舰是有防务目的的，而在西方，造船厂是为了追求利润

告诉美国海军学院，中国海军不构成“海军威胁”，它构成了海军能力。只有西方海军构成威胁。

user-ed9so2rb4k

Really, how long does it take China to build the various types of naval vessels?

Yes Auntie Yellen will complain of over-production and unfair competition!!

说真的，中国建造各种类型的海军舰艇需要多长时间？耶伦阿姨会抱怨生产过剩和不公平竞争的

gelinrefira

I think the most modern version of Type 1130 is now equipped with AESA radars. China's electonic industry and radar technology is so mature and advance that it is putting AESA on everything.

我认为最现代化的1130型现在配备了有源相控阵雷达。中国的电子工业和雷达技术是如此成熟和先进，他们在所有装备上都安装了有源相控阵。

nostradamus2642

The PLAN needs (significant numbers of unmanned long endurance AWACS) to integrate with 052C/052D in anti air and anti missile warfare in a TW scenario should 3rd parties intervene.

中国海军需要大量的无人长航时预警机与052C/052D集成，以便在台海战场中进行防空反导战，如果有第三方介入的话。

hbc511

It needs an additional anti drone platform for protection

需要一个额外的反无人机平台来护卫

ltrond

052D enquips very advanced raidar system, even the latest Arleigh Burke Flight III can't catch up.

052D拥有非常先进的雷达系统，即使是最新的阿利伯克III型也赶不上。

phils4634

The 072C variants may well be upgradeable. This would offer a significant cost saving, and many of the systems used in the -D variant might be incorporated to a greater or lesser effect?

072C型很可能是可升级的，这将大大节省成本，而且D型中使用的许多系统可能会产生或大或小的影响。

user-xw5fs3ye2w

The Chinese Navy's radar is very good, ahead of the Arleigh Burke 3, anti-ship missiles ahead of all the navies in the world, these two are enough.

中国海军的雷达非常优异，领先阿利伯克3，反舰导弹领先世界所有海军，有这两样已经足够。

johnsmith1953x

I'm 100% positive many countries will want to purchase any exportversion of this ship after the "performace" of Russian ships in the Black Sea. Nobody has confidence in Russian ships anymore

我100%肯定，继俄罗斯军舰在黑海的“表现”之后，很多国家会想要购买这种军舰的出口版本。没人再对俄罗斯军舰有信心了

Cepheus77

Great video. One question, why is there always water pumped out above the waterline on Chinese ships?

一个问题是，为什么中国军舰只总是把水抽到吃水线以上?

ziaullahkhan8968

In cost of 2 Alrighburk III the china can build another fujian type Aircraft carrier

用2艘“阿利伯克3型”的成本，中国可以建造一艘福建舰

moss550

The 130mm HPJ45 on 052D has a muzzle brake, the ones on 055 does not.

052D上的130mm HPJ45有炮口制动器，055上的没有。

Wvk5zc

I wonder how is the defense system around china's shipyards since it is apparent that they are if not the most crucial assets china have

我想知道中国造船厂周围的防御系统如何，即使它们不是中国最关键的资产

user-vf2bo3vy7j

$3 billion a ship, so expensive, and I don't know how much it costs to run and maintain, the Navy is really a big waste of money

原来要30亿一艘，这么贵。。。运行维护又不知道要多少钱，海军真是烧钱大户

ex0duzz

How good are Chinese anti air missiles and associated systems in comparison with their Russians counterparts like S300-400-500 etc, or compared with usas various RIM missiles incorporated into their Aegis system?

中国的防空导弹相关系统与俄罗斯的S300/400/500等相比怎么样好，或者与美国的宙斯盾系统中的各种RIM导弹相比如何?

Vokuud

Can you talk about the naval construction in russia ?

能谈谈俄罗斯的海军建设吗?

wawaweewa9159

Smaller ships are the way to go, big ships are too easy to hit and takes away massive power when hit

小一点的军舰是更好的选择，大的太容易被击中，被击中后损失就大了

Shipspotting_Vietnam

Never seen those war ships in a real war yet!!!

从未在真正的战争中见过这些军舰

ycplum7062

The long-range anti-ship missiles are an attempt to compensate for a less capable carrier air strike capability. For this to be effective, the PLAN will also need an equally long-range ISR capability, ideally ship launched.

远程反舰导弹是弥补较弱的航母空中打击能力的一种尝试。为了有效，中国海军还需要同样的远程ISR能力，理想情况下是舰艇发射。

scottgraney5275

Paper tiger

纸老虎

vevenaneathna

china has a lot of catching up to do but is growing fast. imo china has a right to increase its navy strength to parity with usa in the area but no right to use it to isolate Taiwan.

中国还有很多事情要做，他们正在快速增长。在我看来，中国有权在该地区加强海军实力，与美国势均力敌

thomas_jay

The price comparision for the ships is irrelevant.

It only matter if you plan sell the ships to international buyers.

军舰的价格不那么重要，只有当你打算把它卖给国际买家时才重要。

hengzhou4566

Without war, it is a piece of scrap metal.

不打战，就是一坨废铁。