中国每年从印度赚取1000亿美元，如何阻止呢

How China is Stealing $100 Bn from India Every Year? | How to stop it?

中国是如何每年从印度“窃取”1000亿美元的？如何阻止?

As an international relations enthusiast, I was always surprised every time data related to India-China trade releases came. For me, China is a much bigger threat and competitor for India in comparison to any other country in the world, not just because China shares a boundary with India but also because China acts as a direct alternative to India for investors and other major economies.

作为一名热衷研究国际关系的人，每次中印贸易数据发布时，我总是感到惊讶。在我看来，与世界上任何国家比起来，中国是印度更大的威胁和竞争对手，不仅因为中国与印度接壤，还因为对投资者和其他主要经济体来说，中国是印度的直接替代选择。

Even after such direct competition with India, we are not able to balance our trade relations with China. We have consistently increased the overall trade deficit with China.

即使在直接竞争之后，我们也无法平衡与中国的贸易关系。我们对中国的总体贸易逆差持续扩大。

以下是印度网友的评论：

jimmycologne6032

Gupta, China is not stealing anything. China provides critical machinery for industry, precursor chemicals for pharmaceuticals, and numerous other products that allow your economy to function. Indians need to be more industrious and export products that solvent countries like China can buy.

中国没有偷任何东西。中国提供关键的工业机械、制药业的化学品和许多其他产品，让印度经济得以运转。印度人应该更加勤劳，加大出口产品

DineshTwanabasu

How can u say stealing when its a business. Cant u difference between stealing and business transaction?

这是生意，你怎么能说偷？偷窃和商业交易都不会区分吗?

sunlightsoul1222

Our india shall depend on super power China for clean pollution in India.

我们印度应该依靠超级大国中国来解决印度的清洁和污染问题。

adder88

India should thank China for hel its economy make progress.

印度应该感谢中国帮助推动经济取得进步。

dharmendrapatil3336

We have to think, wages of Indian are less than china, but goods are expensive, profile margin are high, corruption is high, stupid laws..,...

我们必须考虑，印度人的工资比中国人低，但商品昂贵，利润率高，腐败严重，法律滞后…

dashirakjyoti1676

Boycott China is our main slogan, Wherever or whenever... But ,You can't imagine how China is stealing from us and We don't do anything for it. It shows,How much dependent we are with China.. Adarsh Gupta Sir really is a gem of a person.. These kind of people should be in Cabinet...

抵制中国是我们的主要口号，无论何时何地…但是，你无法想象中国是如何从我们这里偷东西的，而我们却束手无策。这表明，我们对中国有多依赖…博主真是宝藏，应该进内阁…

sujoy2643

We should say " Replace China". Because we are not in that stage where we could completely ignore China for now. It is a fact. We should not be that much egoistic that we are develo rapidly and in this stage we need China's help in some ways which are very crucial to our economic growth..

我们应该说“取代中国”。我们还没有到可以完全忽略中国的阶段。这是事实。

我们不应该过于以自我为中心，我们正在快速发展，在这个阶段，我们需要中国在某些方面的帮助，这对我们的经济增长至关重要。

huanghermann5207

it is open trade, not stealing. India could stop it tomorrow if it wants. So don't blame China for it.

这是开放的贸易，不是偷窃。如果印度愿意，明天就可以阻止。所以不要怪中国。

sahilkaushik9160

Chines company give employment to indian

Please do some research deeply widely

中国公司给印度人提供就业机会

请做一些深入广泛的研究吧

JikkuMaster

India's industrial sector is growing. May be within next 5 to 10 years we can see a major change. Indias toys industry has grown well.

印度的工业部门正在增长。也许在未来5到10年内，我们可以看到很大的变化。印度的玩具业发展良好。

pankajgondse1407

Russia is the third largest India's trade partener ($65.7 billion)

俄罗斯是印度第三大贸易伙伴(657亿美元)

Khadakvaivlogs

Boycot india from Nepal

尼泊尔抵制印度

user-ru4tj7fk2p

Option c- UAE third trading partners of India

方案C-阿联酋是印度的第三大贸易伙伴

Adg008

It's a very serious problem, but we can't do anything at this point, it's not possible until we can manufacture everything ourselves...

这是一个非常严重的问题，然而我们无能为力，在我们能够自力更生之前，抵制中国货是不可能的……

dr.python

To be honest we will suffer more than Chinese if we boycott them, but there is a good alternative, his is indigenous development (more R&D and manufacturing investment), and attracting FDI away from China (like how Apple is making iPhones here), also there should be less protectionist policies (lowering taxes for imported products).

老实说，如果我们抵制他们，我们会比中国人更痛苦，但有一个很好的选择，那就是自主发展(更多的研发和制造业投资)，吸引外国直接投资(就像苹果在这里生产iPhone一样)，也应该减少保护主义政策，降低进口产品的税收

sunlightsoul1222

Please don't create negative video against our neighbour super power County China. We should have increased business with China.

请不要妖言惑众，攻击我们的邻居超级大国中国。我们应该加大与中国的贸易。

arthurmorgan9921

India is not china every country has different expertise instead we should focus on strengthening the sectors which are already doing good in market like service sector, pharmacuteical, etc rather than competing with china. also we should focus maxmum jobs creation sectors like mining, agriculture, energy sector, basic manufacturing, and many more

印度不是中国，每个国家都有不同的专长，我们应该加强已经在市场上表现良好的行业，比如服务业、制药等，而不是与中国竞争。

此外，我们应该最大限度地关注那些能创造就业机会的行业，如采矿业、农业、能源行业、基础制造业等

kaafi_alsi

In my opinion as a nation we can replace the imports of non essential goods such as Plastic Toys with the toys made in Indian market or at least reduce the numbers

With additional RnD we can Reverse engineer materials made by Chinese companies and in the end deliver similar products of plastics toys in the market.

在我看来，作为一个国家，一些非必需品，我们可以本土生产，比如玩具，或者至少减少进口数量。通过加大研发，我们可以对中国公司生产的材料进行逆向工程，推向市场，取代中国玩具。

keshavsingla5559

R and d is only solution…. But as a investor is to risky ,

Government should create separate ministry for r&d .

研发是唯一的解决方案....但投资者风险太大，政府应该成立独立的研发部。

protograde2723

My TV, washing machine, car, motorcycle and AC are made in India.

我的电视、洗衣机、汽车、摩托车和空调都是印度制造。

tabatapo7131

Government is busy in supporting big business players like Ambhani..they aren't interested in supporting small scale industries in real sense

政府忙于支持安巴尼那样的大企业，他们对支持真正意义上的小型工业不感兴趣

mahammad_gouse

Govt significantly reduced the r and d budget and health care also. And increased the budget in infra. Because infrastructure will give u quick result that could be used for political things. But investment in r and d will take time to show the results

政府也大幅削减了研发预算和医疗保健，增加了基础设施的投入。基础设施能起到立竿见影的效果，被视为政绩。

但研发方面的投资需要时间才能显现成效。

JunHooKim-bn4yc

Simple :

* India is a liberal de ocracy and all you Indian do is:

argue and talk talk talk! talk talk talk talk talk! talk talk ...!

印度是自由民主国家，你们印度人所做的就是：争论、讨论

DeepakDograx323045

What India losing India are too ahead

印度输了什么，印度遥遥领先

aakashrajbhar8627

We should focus on skills and infrastructures.