H-6K and H-6J | The new Chinese strategic bombers with long-range precision strike capability

中国的轰- 6k和轰- 6J ，具有远程精确打击能力的新型战略轰炸机

China's new move to change the balance in the Far East, We are investigating the H-6K and H-6J.

Does the H-6K have any real military value?

What are the differences between the latest ones and the previous H-6 models?

Why does China need a medium / long-range bomber?

Does this aircraft really pose a threat to the USA and its allies?

中国改变远东平衡，我们在研究他们的轰- 6k和轰- 6J。

轰- 6k有真正的军事价值吗？

最新的型号和以前的轰-6型号有什么不同？

为什么中国需要中远程轰炸机？

这款轰炸机真的对美国及其盟友构成威胁吗？

以下是外国网友的评论：

gangyang9801

China's state media has always called it a weapons launch platform, or a bomber.  Because it can launch hypersonic anti-ship missiles to strike US warships at a distance of 1500km. Old plane but new usage

中国官媒一直称其为武器发射平台，是轰炸机。可以发射高超音速反舰导弹，打击1500公里外的美国军舰。旧飞机，新用途。

josephguo3429

H6K is an air carrier for carrying cruise missiles long sword 100. which is useful for attacking air carriers and military bases within a range approx. 5000km.

轰-6K是一种用可携带长剑100巡航导弹的轰炸机。非常适合用来该攻击航空母舰和军事基地，航程5000公里。

Getoffmycloud53

High tech is generally a force multiplier, but quantity has a quality all its own. Super weapons are a double edged sword...

高科技通常是力量倍增器，但数量本身就是一种优势。超级武器是一把双刃剑……

corvanphoenix

I think they're a great idea! Cheap, versatile, long range, reliable & as deadly as your best cruise missiles.

我觉得这是个好主意！便宜，多功能，远程，可靠，和你最好的巡航导弹一样致命。

AO-ow6tt

This bomber also has the potential to be converted to an ECM, AWACS and reconnaissance platform.

这种轰炸机也有可能改造成为ECM、AWACS和侦察平台。

MY-zj8pb

Perfect for its role. You don't need a Ferrari to do grocery shop in real life do you

完美角色。在现实生活中，你不需要开着法拉利去买东西，对吧

yaoypl

Sometimes, you don't need to be highly advanced to beat your opponent. Good enough is good enough.

有时候，你的武器不需要非常先进就能打败对手。足够好就行。

lobstereleven4610

Very cool to see an old plane design upgraded and updated.

看到一架旧飞机的设计升级更新，真是太酷了。

paulschumacher1263

The H6 is a variant of the Tu 16, which premiered in 1952--just like the B-52.

轰-6是图-16的一种改型，图-16于1952年首次亮相，像B-52。

thelogician1934

The latest H6-N can carry one air-launched hyper gliding ICBM.

最新的轰6-N可以携带空射超滑翔洲际弹道导弹。

UD2

Simplicity is undervalued. This thing along with the B52s will be workhorses in a real war.

被低估了，这玩意和B-52会成为战争中的主力。

cck7633

A very efficient and practical design and can be upgraded and upgraded and modified forever. Excellent aerodynamic design and efficient

非常高效和实用的设计，可以一直升级和修改。气动设计优良，效率高。

danthemansmail

As simply a ballistic and cruise missile platform all it needs to do is get to it's launch point. In fact it's only priority would be getting to it's launch point, they would be virtually disposable. So it looks capable enough to me.

作为一个简单的弹道和巡航导弹平台，它要做的就是飞临轰炸上空区域。几乎是一次性的，有去无回。在我看来足够强大了。

Shofotolavski

1. It is not because China has bombers that neighboring countries need U.S. military power, but because of the long-term hostile and unfriendly reconnaissance operations of the U.S. military against China, China must maintain a strong force.

2. The so-called sovereignty dispute in the South China Sea was not a problem until oil was discovered there in 1980. It has always been China’s territory. International law of the sea is not the legal basis for resolving historical territorial waters. Many countries made sovereign declarations when signing this treaty. , China is the same, and the United States has never joined this treaty.

3. Taiwan is a Chinese territory, no matter what he claims to be the Republic of China or whatever, he is just a province in a civil war and rebellion, and foreign countries have no right to interfere.

When the United Nations was first established, it also tried to use force to interfere in the internal affairs of other countries. It was not until they encountered the Chinese army on the Korean peninsula that the United Nations changed its behavior.

1.不是因为中国有轰炸机，周边国家才需要美军保护，而是因为美军长期对中国进行敌对和不友好的侦察行动，中国才努力建设强大的军力。

2. 1980年在南海发现石油之前，所谓的主权争端并不是一个问题，它一直是中国的领土。国际海洋法不是解决历史性领海问题的法律依据。许多国家在签署这项条约时发表了主权声明。中国也是如此，美国从未加入该条约。

3. 联合国成立之初，美国也曾试图用武力干涉别国内政。直到他们在朝鲜半岛遇到中国军队，联合国才改变了态度。

kaga_senpai_2503

TU-16:This is my illegitimate son

图-16：这是我的私生子

asyik6

This is basically still Tu-16 with total improvement.

这基本上还是经过全面改进的图-16。

Zetler

That's like modernizing a B-29 and calling it a leap.

这就像把B-29现代化，然后称之为飞跃。

happylife201

The plane is just platform for launching advanced weapons,so China's recent  arsenal of very long hypersonic anti ship cruise missiles and super long air to air missiles will make the PLA air force very powerful in Asia.

这架轰炸机只是发射先进武器的平台，中国最近的超长高超音速反舰巡航导弹和超长空对空导弹武器库，令解放军空军在亚洲独树一帜，如虎添翼！

rutrose2000

I wouldn't be too worried about these bombers and their capabilities.

我不太担心这些轰炸机

Khosann1

Why do you assume that the H6 bombers would not have a fighter escort and wouldn't be accompanied with additional fighter jets also carrying antiship missiles to keep busy U.S. fighters and saturate ship defenses?

为什么你认为H6轰炸机不会有战斗机护航，也不会有携带反舰导弹的战斗机陪同，应对美国战机，对美国舰艇发动饱和攻击？

LuobingSong

the actual amount of h6 family is over 200

more than 60 of them are newer k/j/n family

the whole bomber fleet can lauch more than 300 long range yj62/100 anti ship missiles, as well as another 300 yj8 series short range anti ship missiles

all exsting h6 family bombers can fire anti ship missiles

the quantity is also some kind of quality

轰-6家族的实际数量超过200架，其中60多架是较新的K/J/N家族

整个轰炸机机群可以一次性发射300多枚远程鹰击-62/100反舰导弹，以及300枚鹰击8系列短程反舰导弹。现有的轰-6系列轰炸机都能发射反舰导弹。数量多也是一种优势

hevosenpaska114

Like B-52 same applies here. If the design works don’t fix it. This is a beautiful plane. 2025 its been 100 years of since US B-52 entered service, upgrading technology and engines it is still 100 years later a best platform of bomber technology. Same applies here. Chinese have upgraded it and it still works great.

和B-52一样。如果设计可行，就不要修改它。这是一架漂亮的轰炸机。2025年是美国B-52服役的第100年年头了，升级了技术和发动机，100年后它仍然是轰炸机技术的最佳平台。中国人对其进行了升级，仍然很赞。

edlee8949

Belongs to the 1960s when the Beatles reigned supreme.

这东西属于20世纪60年代，披头士当红的年代。

vijaymahabir3042

In today’s Morten battle field it a really Nice Target !! This is supposed to be a strategic weapon however if it is accompanied by a swarm of drones it could be a Game changer

在今天的现代战场上，它真的是一个活靶子！这应该是一种战略武器，但是如果有一群无人机护航，它可能会改变战场局势

mathewferstl7042

Awesome looking

太好看了

WAFFENAMT1

 looks very much old school 70's Soviet Tech.

看起来很像非常老式的70年代的苏联技术。

nekslices3503

The H6 might be new but it’s just a Chinese built TU-16 Russian bomber first built in 27 April 1952.

轰-6可能是新的，它只是中国制造的图-16俄罗斯轰炸机，于1952年4月27日首次建造。

sarcasmo57

Well. it's lucky that they have ejector seats.

好吧，幸好他们有弹射座椅。

WSOJ3

H-6N and H-20 are the real deal.

轰- 6N和轰-20是货真价实的。

leipzigrb4910

The latest H-6 is called H-6N, N stands for Nuclear. And for sure, its a brand new plane, new engine, new Avionics System, new radar and so on except looks litte bit like Tu-16.

最新的轰-6被称为轰- 6n， N代表能携带核武器。当然，这是一架全新的轰炸机，新的引擎，新的航空电子系统，新的雷达等等，除了看起来有点像图-16。

marvinm8343

These barely modern bombers could fly in formation over Manila uncontested.

这些不先进的轰炸机可以在马尼拉上空编队飞行，不会受到争议。

vondertann8218

Chinese is running out of alphabet to name the aircraft's models

中国已经没有字母来命名轰炸机的型号了，字母快不够用了