Why India Doesn’t Build Skyscrapers
为什么印度不建摩天大楼
以下是外国网友的评论：
dwarasamudra8889
You forgot to mention the dreaded Airports Authority of India. They impose strict height restrictions across many cities like in Mumbai and Gandhinagar. Mumbai had many skyscrapers above 300m underconstruction (around 15-20) but the AAI stalled these projects and the skyscrapers ended up being only around 220-280m like the World One Tower which was initially meant to be 410m. Conversely, Hyderabad is a city with currently no FSI restrictions and so many skyscrapers (around 200m) are currently underconstruction. Delhi and Bengaluru still have extremely strict FSI though. Dont be under the impression that no skyscrapers are being built in India though. Mumbai, Delhi NCR, Hyderabad and to a lesser extent Kolkata, are all having skyscraper construction booms
你忘了提印度机场管理局有多严格。他们在孟买和甘地纳加尔等许多城市实施严格的楼高限制。孟买有许多300米以上的摩天大楼正在建设中（大约15-20栋），但印度机场管理局叫停了这些项目，这些摩天大楼最终只建到220-280米左右，比如世界第一大厦，最初的计划是410米。海得拉巴是一个目前没有FSI限制的城市，许多摩天大楼（大约200米）目前正在建设中。德里和班加罗尔仍然有非常严格的FSI限制。不要以为印度没有摩天大楼。孟买、德里NCR、海德拉巴和加尔各答（程度稍轻）都出现了摩天大楼建设潮。
TempleGuitars
India does build skyscrapers. It's just they're all in the Emirates.
印度确实建造了摩天大楼，只是它们都在阿联酋。
surisuresh100
For example, Hyderabad is expanding horizontally that too dramatically increased over last few years . many Hyderbadis love to stay in Individual houses.
海德拉巴正在横向扩张，在过去几年里扩张得太快了。海得巴人喜欢住独栋。
sayan_roy_
I don't know about other cities but at least in Kolkata, there were some skyscrapers projects scrapped due to height regulations imposed by Airport Authority in India , especially because the area in which skyscrapers were about to be built in Newtown - Rajarhat area which is pretty close to the airport. Of course, there are multiple factors.
我不知道其他城市的情况，但至少在加尔各答，由于印度机场管理局实施的高度规定，一些摩天大楼项目被取消了，特别是因为即将建造摩天大楼的地区是新镇-拉贾哈特地区，离机场很近。当然，还有其他多种因素。
harshitbaweja5594
I always wondered as an Indian why does our country have an extreme lack of skyscrapers! Now I know, thanks for the video
作为印度人，我一直在想，为什么我们国家极度缺乏摩天大楼！现在我知道了，谢谢。
tvts5157
This was really interesting and informative. I am an Indian but I never realised how few sky scrappers we have. I just hope we keep growing as a country and are able to solve this problem in the coming years.
真是有趣又有见地。我是印度人，但我从觉得我们的摩天大楼如此之少。只希望我们国家继续发展，并能够在未来几年解决这个问题。
MithunOnTheNet
Leaving out Airports Authority of India's cock-blocking any attempt from a builder to go beyond 300 meters in Mumbai is a big omission on B1M's part.
印度机场管理局（Airports Authority）不让建筑商在孟买建超过300米的大楼。
thanghauzel
Shillong has a rule that restricts building more than 3 stories for residential and 5 stories for commercial kee in mind the location being earthquake prone zone.
考虑到西隆是地震易发区，该地有一个规定，住宅建筑不能超过3层，商业建筑不能超过5层。
SaadAliArts
Cities like Mumbai, Chennai, Hyderabad, Banglore, Kochi, Thiruvananthapuram and Visakhapatnam have potential to build more and more skyscrapers. Mumbai's high population density needs more sky scrapers like New York, Hong Kong, Singapore and Tokyo
孟买、金奈、海德拉巴、班加罗尔、科钦、特里凡得琅和维沙卡帕特南等城市有潜力建造越来越多的摩天大楼。孟买的人口密度大，应该像纽约、香港、新加坡和东京那样多建造一些摩天大楼
Sohampn
something you forgot to mention was that Mumbai's Municipal Corporation gives concessions to builders on the FSI limit if the builder does something for them in return say for example the builder provides public parking in the complex the Municipality would allow the builder to build higher.
Another thing is that Mumbai's airport is smack in the middle of the city even if builders wanted to build higher they cant because the Airport Authority interferes and lowers the heights of buildings. for eg. they stopped the contruction of a 320m building called palais royale and made them reduce floors similarly they did not give clearance to another builder who wanted to build a 400m residential tower (the same tower now stands at 290m)
你忘了提的是，孟买市政公司在楼高限制上向建筑商让步，如果建筑商回报一些东西，比如建筑商在综合体中提供公共停车场，市政当局会允许建筑商建得更高。
另一件事是，孟买的机场正好在市中心，即使建筑商想建得更高，他们也不能，因为机场管理局降低了建筑物的高度。比如，他们叫停建造一座320米高的建筑“皇家宫殿”，并要求他们减少楼层。同样，他们也没有给另一个想要建造一座400米住宅楼的建筑商放行（限制在290米高）。
ayushc5704
although i agree with most of these but living in a 2nd tier we do not experience powercuts that often at all since past 5 years..
我同意大部分观点，但生活在二线国家，我们在过去5年里没有经常经历断电…
altezzaandre9651
As Indonesia, I'm also confused why there aren't many skyscrapers in India when it's good for a high population
作为印度尼西亚人，我也很困惑，为什么印度人口多，却没有很多摩天大楼
TheKimberlyashton
Bear in mind, building tall skyscrapers is not equal to modernization or better living standards, improvement of satisfaction of people living in the area is the true goal of modernization, it's not simply defined by the heights of buildings.
请记住，建造摩天大楼并不等于现代化或生活水平更高，提高在该地区人们的居住满意度才是现代化的真正目标，不是简单地看建筑物的高度
melonlord2283
Even while building my residential house, we had to pay a fine for going a little over the prescribed height limit. So in short, the height regulations here are strict.
即使在建自建房时，我们也不得不为稍微超过限高而支付罚款。简而言之，印度的楼高规定很严格。
namankulshrestha5373
The main reason is the great AIRPORT AUTHORITY OF INDIA
There are many buildings which are have some different and amazing structure like namste tower but
The aai stopped this because of too much height
All reason like water and electricity are not big issue atleast now
But good things is many Skyscraper is under construction i only know ant Mumbai there are more than 250 Skyscrapers which are aproved by aai
主要是因为印度的机场管理局
有许多建筑设计都很不错，像纳姆斯特塔，但是被机场管理局叫停了，因为太高了。水电等原因都不是大问题，至少现在不是
好消息是许多摩天大楼正在建设中，我只知道孟买有250多座摩天大楼得到了机场管理局的批准
naumtemnomedeusuario
Brazil has somewhat similar restrictions. We don't face infrastructure shortages like India, but we do have restrictions on height and FSI. For instance, Greater Rio de Janeiro has around 13 million people, but very few buildings with more than 30 stories. Even on plots of land around suburban trains, subway lines or major highways, we have restricted building codes. This forces people outwards and to the slums.
巴西也有类似的限制。我们不像印度那样面临基础设施短缺，但我们对楼高有限制。例如，大里约热内卢有大约1300万人口，但很少有超过30层的建筑。即使是在郊区火车、地铁线路或主要高速公路周围，我们也有严格的建筑规范。这迫使人们向外迁移，住进贫民窟。
dunnowy123
I also don't think EVERYWHERE has got to have them, and the days of skyscraper mania is thankfully behind us. I think it's a good thing India doesn't have as many
我认为不是每个地方都必须有摩天大楼，谢天谢地，摩天大楼狂热的日子已经过去了。我认为印度没有那么多摩天大楼是件好事
avenfeeder1892
I'm not a fan of skyscraper districts. The skyline becomes cluttered and the streets and parks are claustrophobic. The infrastructure of such areas is also overwhelmed. Better to decentralise business districts.
我不喜欢摩天大楼聚集，天际线变得杂乱，街道和公园变得幽闭恐怖。这些地区的基础设施也不堪重负。最好是将商业区分散。
putinfromrussia
The Northern part of India is very prone to earthquakes that's why the government has very strict regulations specially in the Northern part like delhi
印度北部很容易发生地震，政府有非常严格的限高，特别是在德里这样的北部地区
sandeep-r2c6d
Indians are very down to earth
印度人是非常务实的
yashgulave8366
India may not have a skyscrapers but the landscape is changing. The city where I live, PCMC(Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal Corporation) was just a small industrial town when I was born 20 years ago. Today, the city has 3 zones planned specifically for IT parks and PCMC is not even a major city in India. It's a satellite city to Pune, also known as Oxford of the East, and which has the second largest IT park in India after Bangalore.
It's crazy how much things have changed in just 20 years.
印度虽然没有很多摩天大楼，但景观正在改变。20年前我出生的时候，我居住的城市只是一个小工业城镇。今天，这个城市有3个专门为IT园区规划的区域，我们这里还不是印度的大城市，是普纳的卫星城，普纳也被称为东方牛津，它拥有仅次于班加罗尔的印度第二大IT园区。短短20年里发生了如此大的变化，真是不可思议。
indicraft1775
Indian cities does build a large number of skyscrapers but almost all of them are residential. Even the 300 mtrs ones in mumbai are residential skyscrapers. Indian cities don't invest money on building showpiece skyscrapers like gulf cities or Chinese cities.
Instead Indian cities invest huge number of money on building metrorail and suburban rail because that's the most demanded infrastructure in Indian cities and not showpiece skyscrapers.
For example cities like Jakarta or
Ho chi min have far more skyscrapers than Delhi. But delhi has a far far far bigger metro rail system than those cities.(close to 400 kms). Indian authorities are currently mostly focusing on rapid transit networks in our cities and their focus on skyscrapers is almost nil.
印度城市确实建造了大量的摩天大楼，但几乎所有的摩天大楼都是住宅。即使是孟买300米高的摩天大楼也是住宅楼。印度城市不会像海湾城市或中国城市那样投资建造样板摩天大楼。
相反，印度城市投入大量资金建设地铁和郊区铁路，因为这是印度城市最需要的基础设施，而不是摩天大楼。
比如像雅加达或胡志明市这样的城市，摩天大楼比德里多得多。但德里的地铁系统比那些城市大得多（接近400公里）。印度当局目前主要关注城市的快速交通网络，他们对摩天大楼的关注几乎为零。
lord_of_love_and_thunder
Tall skyscrapers usually have luxury residences, not affordable housing. I dont think building taller is a solution to a housing shortage. Mainly access to better housing relies on good financing and controlling construction costs.
摩天大楼通常是豪华住宅，而不是经济适用房。我认为建得更高并非是解决住房短缺的办法。获得更好的住房主要依赖于良好的融资和控制建筑成本。
abhisheksaxena7227
Mumbai has some amazing skyscrapers. I'm going there this December. Excited to take some photos.
孟买有一些令人惊叹的摩天大楼。我今年12月要去那里，很想拍些照片。
pavann3019
Simple reason is people lose absolute ownership of land which they think is paramount. Even celebrities prefer a mansion instead of buying a floor or penthouse as liquidity value of apartments is very less compared to actual land
原因是人们失去了他们认为最重要土地的绝对所有权。即使是名人也不愿意购买一层楼或顶层公寓，因为公寓的流动价值与实际土地相比要低得多
pratyushmishra9112
As far as I have seen in every country the area which have tallest skyscrapers they are called downtown area where housing price is so high where middle class or lower cannot afford it. In India like country where middle class and lower population are the majority ones, there building skyscrapers are unaffordable ones. Only if skyscrapers can be made affordable for Indian general population then only it makes sense to build those.
据我所见，在每个国家，拥有最高摩天大楼的地区被称为市中心，那里的房价很高，中产阶级及以下的人买不起。在印度这样一个中产阶级和下层人口占多数的国家，建造摩天大楼是负担不起的。只有当印度普通民众能够负担得起摩天大楼时，建造这些摩天大楼才有意义。
此文由 三泰虎 编辑，未经允许不得转载！：首页 > 资讯 » 为什么印度不建摩天大楼
孟买的超级富豪和超级穷人：印度大都市的贫民窟与摩天大楼