为什么美国要努力重返月球

Why The US is Struggling to Return to the Moon

为什么美国要努力重返月球？

以下是外国网友的评论：

OctavianTech

Apollo 17 was 1972 not 1952

阿波罗17号是1972年，不是1952年

ritobs

China: we are launching our new Lunar prog-

US: Alright boys, its time to explore freedom

中国：我们正启动新的探月计划

美国：好了，孩子们，是时候探索自由了

TiagoNugentComposer

NASA: Can we have money to go back to the moon please

Congress: best I can do is $3

NASA：我们能有钱重返月球吗

国会：最多只出3美元

Chris-ok4zo

Many KSP players can attest to how difficult it is to land on a foreign celestial object.

许多KSP玩家都可以证明，在一个陌生的天体上着陆是多么困难。

SolarWebsite

That may or may not happen, but when it does, a new space race may erupt. Better than a war, or course.

一场新的太空竞赛可能会爆发，不过比战争好。

TheoneandonlyRAH

honestly after watching all these videos, i dont really get how we got to the moon in the first place?

老实说，看完后，我真的不明白我们是如何登上月球的？

JigilJigil

You have to keep in mind that both Astrobotic with 130 employees, and Intuitive Machines with 250+ employees, are small companies, despite the failure, it's great to see that small private companies are attempting to land on the Moon.

拥有130名员工的Astrobotic和拥有250多名员工的Intuitive Machines都是小公司，尽管失败了，但看到小型私营公司尝试登月是件好事。

austinlarson1528

We must return. Monke was meant for da moon.

我们必须重返月球。

pewpewsalote8802

Keep in mind, The apollo program had 10 flights before Apollo 11 that gradually tested the mission in progressing stages. They did not land first try, in fact their first try was even more catastrophic than our silly little crash, we actually made it to the moon on our first try and Apollo 1 didn't even make it off the launch pad..

请记住，在阿波罗11号之前，阿波罗计划进行了10次飞行，逐步测试了任务的各个阶段。他们第一次尝试没有着陆，事实上他们的第一次尝试比坠毁更具灾难性，我们第一次尝试就成功登上了月球，阿波罗1号甚至没有离开发射台。

edmundsdemonds8309

What changed? Congress won't give NASA an unlimited budget anymore :P

发生了什么变化？国会不会再给NASA无限的预算了

MorRobots

Gen Z Silicon valley robot rocket boys will do anything to avoid using Radar... accurate to within millimeter and can even do SAR imaging on approach.

硅谷的Z世代机器人火箭男孩会尽一切努力避免使用雷达，精确到毫米以内，甚至可以在接近时进行SAR成像。

giant_sandwich7748

They face the same difficulties that we face in Kerbal space program

What a small world

他们面临的困难和我们在Kerbal太空计划中面临的困难一样，世界真小

danolver913

"NASA's budget is too big" 14:19 they're literally still having to use Windows XP

“NASA的预算太高了”，他们实际上还在使用Windows XP

ziploxan8516

I'm so glad we stopped relying on RELIABLE things like sonar, radar, laser, etc and switched to cameras.... Can't we just appreciate the fact that we have the 3D map

很高兴我们不再依赖诸如如声纳、雷达、激光等，而是改用相机....难道我们就不能欣赏自己有3D地图的事实吗？

James-Alai

It cracks me up how NASA is doing "Early exploratory missions" to the moon 51 years after humans already landed on it.

NASA在人类登陆月球51年后，还在对月球进行“早期探索任务”，让我想笑。

oliverfalco7060

I prefer the approach they took on that mars rober... just put it inside a giant inflatable ball and let it roll till it lands, it's just more fun

我更喜欢他们处理火星探测器的方法，把它放在一个巨大的充气球里，让它滚动直到落地，更有趣。

MattDamon-tl3qw

There's no reason Odysseus should have tipped over. There are all sorts of sensors that could have avoided that rock- radar, lidar, and cameras to name a few.

奥德修斯没理由会摔倒，有各种各样的传感器可以避免岩石——雷达、激光雷达和相机等等。

jimmyryan5880

I dont want to put science and engineering at odds but science is often justification for doing space stuff but I think engineering is just as good a justification. What I mean is learning how to build a craft that can keep people happy and healthy while traveling to the moon or mars is a justification in and of itself and the technologies that come from projects like that start entire economic booms.

我不想把科学和工程对立起来，但去太空一般就是为了搞科研，我认为工程也是一个很好的理由。我的意思是，学习如何建造一艘飞船，让人们在去月球或火星旅行时感到快乐和健康，这本身就是一个理由，而这样的技术会推动整体经济繁荣。

Prifly70

Welp, there’s no blank check due to geopolitics this time around, yet. I was lucky to be raised by an L.E.M. engineer, so my view is a bit skewed towards “ My dad did it, why can’t you guys?” point of view. But really it’s money and public willingness. And money.

好吧，由于地缘政治的原因，这次没开空白支票。我的爸爸是一个机电工程师，所以我的观点有点偏向于“我爸爸做到了，为什么你们不能？”的观点。但实际上是关乎资金和公众意愿。

cinavik

Apollo had incredible ambition and backing and that really made the difference. Everyone was on the same goal.

阿波罗计划有令人难以置信的雄心支持，这真的很重要，众志成城，目标一致。

Tomoyo0827

Chinese: planned 20-year long space program that wont be affected by budget issues, political climate, military overspending and dedication.

NASA: has a new budget and mission objectives every 4 years.

Who do you think is gonna win?

中国：计划长达20年的太空项目，不会受到预算问题、政治气候、军事超支和投入的影响。

NASA：每四年有一个新的预算和任务目标。

你们觉得谁会赢？

vishwakkanna9935

Because, Doing a moon landing for first time is always harder, keep pushing USA

因为第一次登月总是很难，加油吧美国

keegandecker4080

The moon would make an interesting refueling station but the real money is in the asteroid belt out past mars. First dude to bring one of those babies home gets to retire for a hundred generations

月球将成为一个有趣的燃料补给站，但真正的矿在火星旁边的小行星带。第一个把这些宝贝带回家的人可以躺平一百代

vidyasagarronanki2076

Surprising omission of India's ISRO successful missions to the moon, including a rover.

令人惊讶的是，印度空间研究组织（ISRO）没有成功执行登月任务，包括着陆一辆月球车。

2x2is22

After watching this, it's a miracle everyone who went there came back

每个去过那里的人都回来了，真是个奇迹

charlie15627

It would make more sense to have 2 cameras on opposite sides of the lander. With both of them mounted on rotating brackets. That way, the system is much more secure from an unexpected contact disabling the entire lander. It would also get some really awesome moonscape images.

在着陆器的两侧安装两个摄像头会更有意义。它们都安装在旋转支架上。这样一来，系统就更加安全，避免意外接触导致整个着陆器瘫痪，也能捕捉到一些非常棒的月球景观图像。

ChosenMan37

First time is always hard I guess. They gotta do it for real now.

第一次总是很难，他们现在得认真做了。

AaryanLande-uf9ki

I'm surprised that there is no mention of ISRO or Chandrayaan-3

我很惊讶的是居然没有提到印度的ISRO或月船3号

hikodzu

Simple, bcs it's not a 'return', it's their first time

很简单，因为这不是“重返”，这是他们的第一次

CoolCalmCoop

I hope we can go to the moon commercially in my lifetime.