印度央行行长就穆迪的“印度制造”宣传发出警示

Manoj• 560 • • neeraj arya • Location •

India is better in the service sector, like IT, back office operations. Compared to , Indians are better educated (degree wise) and speak better English.

印度最好还是呆在服务业，像IT、后台操作。相比，印度人受教育更好（学位而言），英语说得也更好。

sk vm• 11629 • • Manoj • Tamil Nadu •

Agree. But it wont enough unless we see a Industrial revolution.

同意。但这还不够，除非我们见证一次工业革命。

Sudeep• Am Pa•

You are telling a world renowned economist and Finance guru who teaches at University of Chicago that he don't understand economics?
What he said is absolutely correct. We should focus on creating an internal market, than trying to replicate manufacturing model. Even is trying to get out of their model, due the pollution and environmental issues it created. Manufacturing will go to places where the labor is cheap and abundant. It also needs systems in place and a disciplined workforce.

你是说一位在芝加哥大学授课、世界有名的经济学家和金融大师不懂经济？

他说的绝对正确。我们应该注重于创建一个内部市场，而不是复制的制造模式。因为它引起了污染和环境问题，即使自己也在设法走出这个模式。制造业会跑到劳动力既便宜又充足的地方去。它还需要有现成的制度和训练有素的劳动队伍。

Channel Ten• 510 •• Sudeep •

Sudeep you are correct..

Sudeep，你说得对。

PutSomeNameHere•

Economics is not a science - so economic theories are often morphed to serve political needs. The economic theories espoused in the US works for the US and are advantageous for the US. The same theories may not work for India. Rajan's coddling of banks (ATM fees, 1 week ago) is an example of an action that works in the US, but not in India. That was a bad move. This opinion is also bad. India needs to protect its manufacturing, not for export but to prevent being flooded with goods. Import substitution generally leads to lower quality, true - but the low-end goods from already has lower quality. The reason why textbook theories do not work here is because is a special case - they are an autocratic country with artifically low slave-level salaries for labour. They are hardly a fair competitor. We should protect against such competitors.

经济学不是一门科学 - 因此它常被挪来为政治需要服务。美国采用的经济学理论在美国管用，而且对美国有利。同样的理论到印度可能就不管用了。拉见对银行的悉心照顾（自动取款机收费，一周前）就是一种措施在美国奏效而在印度不管用的例子。那个举措不好。这个意见也不行。印度需要保护自己的制造业，不为出口但为防止货涌入。进口替代通常导致质量下降，这是对的- 但从来的低端产品已经是低质量了。书本理论在这里不管用的原因是，因为是个特例 - 他们是个毒菜国家，有着低下的、奴隶水平的劳工工资。几乎算不上公平竞争者。我们要防止这类竞争者。

Mohit Bhardwaj b•

Then follow the model of

那就照模式走吧

PutSomeNameHere• 2129 • • Mohit Bhardwaj b •

That would mean disbanding elections, for starters. is low cost just because people don't have a voice. You can see a few documentaries etc. of labour conditions - our poor live much much better.

那会意味着，首先撤散竞选。成本低只是因为人民不能发声。你可以看一些劳工条件的记录片等等 - 我们的穷人生活好得多得多了。

vijay kumar• 5710 • • Mohit Bhardwaj b • new delhi •

How can you can compare with which is 5 times powerful in all fields than India. It takes time to develop and only speeches wo'nt fulfil hungry bellies of the country men.

你怎么能跟比，他们在各个领域都比印度强5倍。发展要时间，光说空话填不饱国人的空肚皮。

Yogesh Dhamane• 6060 • • Bangalore •

tel us solutions not problem s.....because there is no problem without solution

跟我们说说解决办法而不是问题…因为没有无解的问题

PutSomeNameHere• 2129 • • Yogesh Dhamane •

His solution - not directly mentioned in this news report - is to open markets and reduce import tariff.

他的解决办法 - 没在这篇新报道中直接提到- 是开放市场、降低进口关税。

Antonio Barbosa• 8615 • • Yogesh Dhamane • Goa •

Modi's solution will lead to further problems. Why do you think that is moving away from manufacturing? Where is the power necessary for manufacturing?

穆迪的解决方案会导致进一步的问题。为什么你认为在离开制造业？哪里有制造业必需的电力？

typsygypsy gypsytypsy• 3809 • • oz •

MAKE IN INDIA ....QUALITY ASSURANCE .... OUT OF THE WINDOW

印度制造…质量保证…名誉扫地

ingu•

succeeded back in the 90s because the powerhouse consumer USA economy was on boom. Now unfortunately USA is spent and has closed its market. Without any major consumer, any producer will have a tough time. So the advice of the RBI Governor is right.

早在90年代取得成功，因为这个经济强国的消费者美国正当经济繁荣。不幸的是现在美国钱花完了、市场也关门了。没有任何大消费者，哪个生产商都会日子难过。因此印度央行行长的建议是对的。