profitendieu 3h ago
3
0
1
it's just a stone from a mood ring theAmericans dropped when they covered this same ground 4 decades ago!
这不过是美国人40年前在这个地方扔下的一个戒指而形成的一块石头。
scoott 3h ago
1
2
why are there no stars in the photo? who istaking the photo? where is it taken from?
为什么这张照片中没有出现星星？谁拍的这张照片？从哪里拍摄的？
burningbush scoott 2h ago
5
1
2
The exposure for the moon's surface is notlong enough to pick up stars, however at least this pic has the rovers tyretracks, many Apollo pics didn't!
这张照片中，月球表面的暴露长度不够长，所以拍不到星星，然而至少这张照片中有登月车的车轮轨迹，而很多阿波罗登月车的照片中都没有车轮轨迹。
kglowe scoott 1h ago
1
2
The surface of the moon is in daylight.It's too bright for any camera to see stars.
因为当时的月球表面处于白天之中。所以太亮了，相机根本无法拍摄到星星。
EarlofSandwiches 3h ago
0
1
Everyone knows the moon is made of greencheese, but now we know it's made with unhomogenised milk.
大家都知道月球是由干奶酪组成的，但是现在我们知道其实是由不均匀的牛奶组成的。
Timelooper 3h ago
0
1
I'm surprised that the Chinese haven'tdeclared the Moon a suburb of Peking.
)
我感到惊讶的是中国人还没宣称月球是北京的郊区。
frombrussels 5h ago
0
1
2
....What puzzles me and many others with me: WHY don t they just send people up there ?? It was a piece of cake in thesixties and seventies, so why not NOW when technology has advanced 1000fold ??Unless of course the Apollo program was one big lie....Was it ?
让我和其他很多人感到不解的是：为什么不把人送到月球上面去？？在六七十年代的时候就已经是小菜一碟的事情，现在的技术比之前先进1000倍，为什么不送人上去呢？除非阿波罗计划真的是骗人的。
IrishinToronto frombrussels 5h ago
13
14
It's still a lot more expensive anddangerous to send people. Since technology is in fact much more advanced, whynot just save money and send robots?
送人上去依然是昂贵和危险的。由于技术更加先进了，所以为什么不省点钱直接送机器人上去呢？
kevink frombrussels 5h ago
7
8
You have to bring people back alive. Thatadds a huge amount of cost and complexty.
送上去后，还要把人安全的送回来。这样一来成本更高也更加复杂。
此文由 三泰虎 编辑，未经允许不得转载！：首页 > 科技 » 中国登月车发现新型月球岩石，英网友：很高兴中国做出了贡献