中国对印度有什么优势

What are 's advantages over India?

对印度有什么优势？

QUORA网站读者评论：

Balaji Viswanathan, Knowledge lover

More friendly to business and investment

Yesterday, I was at LinuxCon in Chicago - a major business/tech convention and was chatting with execs on setting up businesses in India. With a beer in hand, each recounted their horror stories in setting offices in India. They are all well meaning business folks and each could have brought a lot more well-paying jobs & better tech. But, no.

In India, we are still living in the 19th century business & trade environment, still debating on Walmart's entry to India and FDI. is lightning years ahead. They allowed Walmart to set shop 18 years ago, revolutionized their retail and extremely ahead in logistics, while we are in stone age retail. That is just one sector, but the same is everywhere.

Look at our world rank below on ease of doing business. I get it that it takes years to construct roads, dams, airports etc. But this is just ease of doing business, almost entirely dependent on our attitudes. We have to change our anti-business attitudes. Anti-business lobbies should be pushed out. Nehruvian socialism has turned us too cynical and against our businesses.

更友好的商业和投资环境

昨天，我在芝加哥参加LinuxCon——一个重要的商业/技术会议，和公司高管们谈论在印度建立企业。每个人手里拿着啤酒，讲述了在印度设立办事处时经历的恐怖故事。他们都是善良的商人，每个人都可以给印度带去更多高薪工作岗位和更好的技术。但是，没有。

在印度，我们仍然生活在19世纪的商业和贸易环境中，仍然在讨论沃尔玛进入印度和外国直接投资。已经领先我们好多光年了。18年前，他们就允许沃尔玛开店，彻底革新了他们的零售业，他们在物流方面非常领先，而我们的零售业还处于石器时代。这还只是一个领域，各个领域都是如此。

看看我们在全球商业便利度的排名吧。我明白建造道路、水坝、机场等需要花费很多年时间。但这只是商业便利度，基本上完全取决于我们的态度。我们必须改变我们的反商业态度。反商业游说应该取缔。尼赫鲁的社会主义让我们过于愤世嫉俗，不利于我们的商业。

译文来源：三泰虎 https://www.santaihu.com/46574.html 译者：Joyceliu

vs. India: Which is better for doing business?

vs印度：在哪个国家好做生意？

See India's exports below vs. 's. Good luck trying to grow it by driving away foreign investment.

看看下面这个印度和的出口额对比图。要赶走外国投资来发展印度的出口贸易，祝你好运。

In every indicator of capitalism - trade, investment, competitiveness and ease of doing business, is way ahead.

在zb主义的每个指标中——贸易、投资、竞争力和商业便利度——都遥遥领先。

's health is way ahead:

Mao might be c-- for a lot of things. But, in many ways he was also a pragmatist. One of the key innovations of his time was this: Barefoot doctor. These were semi-educated village doctors who dramatically improved health outcomes in the rural areas. Instead of producing only a few 1000 doctors who got through a 7-year school, why not produce 1 million doctors who go through 1-year school have basic knowledge of diseases and sanitation? This is very important for a nation growing up. ’s village doctors take great strides

India failed to do this and focusing only on Western-style Medical education. Thus, we have too few doctors to take care of 600,000 villages. As crossed the stage 1, they abolished the Barefoot doctors and are busy in stage 2. This and other healthcare innovations show up in the stats below.

的民众健康领先我们：

毛是一个实用主义者。他的时代最重要的创新之一就是赤脚医生。这些受过一定教育的乡村医生，极大地改善了农村地区的健康状况。与其只培养几千名通过7年制医科学习的医生，为什么不培养100万名完成1年制学习的具有疾病和卫生基础知识的医生呢？这对于一个国家的发展非常重要。的乡村医生大踏步发展。

印度就没有做到这一点，只注重西式医学教育。因此，我们的医生人数要负责600000个村庄，实在太少了。当跨过第一阶段后，他们取消了赤脚医生，开始了第二阶段。这和其他医疗保健创新可以通过下面的统计数据看到。

How can a sick under-nutritioned nation grow fast?

民众营养不良的国家怎么可能快速发展？

's Infrastructure

Nothing more to say here. has got some of the fantastic roads, railways, ports, etc. I will just use one statistic to dramatically drive home the point.

的基础设施

没什么可说的。有一些很棒的道路、铁路、港口等等。我只要用一个统计数字就能说明这一点。

Size and resources

is more than thrice the size of India with way more water, energy and mineral resources. I will give you one example of iron ore. See the blue lines vs other lines.

规模与资源

的水量、能源和矿产资源比印度多三倍多。我给你举一个铁矿石的例子，看看蓝线和其他线的对比。