美国雅虎：中国反对菲律宾部署美导弹

China opposes US missile deployed by Philippines

中国反对菲律宾部署美国导弹。

China has urged the Philippines to withdraw the United States' "Typhon" intermediate range missile, the defence ministry said on Friday, accusing the Southeast Asian nation of breaking its "promises" by introducing the missile system.

The system is part of a U.S. drive to amass a variety of anti-ship weapons in Asia. The weapon drew sharp criticism from China when first deployed in April 2024 during a training exercise.

The Philippines was not "only giving up its own security and national defence to others, but also introducing the risks of geopolitical confrontation and arms race into the region," said Zhang iaogang, a spokesman for the Chinese defence ministry.

The missile system is a "strategic offensive weapon" and the Philippine side had "repeatedly broken its promises and catered to the U.S. side in introducing this system," he added.

中国国防部周五表示，已敦促菲律宾撤回美国的“堤丰”中程导弹，并指责这个东南亚国家引入该导弹系统，违背了其“承诺”。

该系统是美国在亚洲囤积各类反舰武器计划的一部分。2024年4月，该武器在一次训练演习中首次部署时，就遭到了中国的严厉批评。

中国国防部发言人张晓刚表示，菲律宾“不仅将自身安全与国防拱手让人，还将地缘政治对抗和军备竞赛的风险引入地区”。

他补充说，该导弹系统是一种“战略进攻性武器”，菲律宾方面“屡屡违背承诺，迎合美方引入这一系统”。

The comments came as Jonathan Malaya, a spokesperson for the Philippines National Security Council, told a press conference the Typhon missile was only meant for defence, and that the Philippines had never promised to withdraw the Typhon missile.

The Philippines "adheres to its pacifist constitution which renounces war as an instrument of national policy," Malaya said.

The Philippines embassy and the U.S. embassy in Beiing did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

The U.S. military moved its Typhon launchers - which can fire multipurpose missiles distances of up to thousands of kilometres - from Laoag airfield in the Philippines to another site on the island of Luzon, Reuters reported in January.

The Tomahawk cruise missiles in the launchers can hit targets in both China and Russia from the Philippines, while the SM-6 missiles it also carries can strike air or sea targets more than 200 km (165 miles) away.

这番言论发表之际，菲律宾国家安全委员会发言人乔纳森·马拉亚在新闻发布会上称，“堤丰”导弹仅用于防御，且菲律宾从未承诺撤回“堤丰”导弹。

马拉亚说，菲律宾“坚守其和平主义宪法，放弃将战争作为国家政策的工具”。

菲律宾驻华大使馆和美国驻华大使馆未立即回应置评请求。

据路透社1月报道，美国军方已将其“堤丰”发射装置（可发射射程达数千公里的多用途导弹）从菲律宾佬沃机场转移至吕宋岛的另一地点。

发射装置中的“战斧”巡航导弹从菲律宾可打击中国和俄罗斯的目标，而它携带的SM - 6导弹则能打击200多公里（165英里）外的空中或海上目标。

以下是美国雅虎读者的评论：

Tony
It is Non of China's business if the Philippines allows, deploys or purchase such missiles. The Philippines is a sovereign country and China has no business dictating on what the Philippines should and should not do.

菲律宾要是允许部署或者购买这些导弹，跟中国有啥关系啊。菲律宾是个主权国家，中国凭啥对菲律宾该干啥不该干啥指手画脚的。

Paul
Sure, the Philippines has the right to be the target in the event of war.

行啊，菲律宾要是乐意，战时当靶子的权利还是有的。

Allan
none of your business

关你什么事啊

paul
Sure, dead Filipinos are none of your business.

可不咋的，菲律宾人死不死跟你有啥关系。

BG
The US should add more typhon missile launchers, and the Philippines should add more Brahmos and other missile defense shield to create A2/AD in their own territory. One Typhon, and 3 Brahmos missile launchers are not even game changer, they need to add more in the hundreds.

美国就该多部署点“堤丰”导弹发射器，菲律宾也得多搞点“布拉莫斯”导弹还有其他导弹防御系统，在自家地盘上搞个反介入/区域拒止（A2/AD）体系出来。就一套“堤丰”和三套“布拉莫斯”导弹发射器，根本改变不了啥局势，怎么也得搞个几百套才行。

haha
Dismantle your nukes and we'll remove the American weapons - how about that?! Whatever we Filipinos do within the bounds of our sovereign territory we can rightfully do so!

你们先把核弹拆了，我们就撤走美国武器，咋样？！只要是在菲律宾主权范围内，我们爱咋干就咋干！

M
I'm not Chinese. I do not believe China aims their missiles on the Philippines. I believed Philippines' leader benefits from the US to bases their missiles there personally so he lets the US to based their missiles there. If anything go wrong, he will take the first flight to NYC where he has his penthouse there, with the US money in his account.

我可不是中国人哈。我觉得中国不会拿导弹瞄准菲律宾。我看啊，就是菲律宾领导人从美国那捞着好处了，所以才让美国在这部署导弹。要是出了事，他肯定第一时间坐飞机跑去纽约，他在那可有顶层公寓，美国给的钱都在他账户里呢。

Robert
China does aim their missiles at the Philippines alone with water cannons, lasers and militia.

东大可不就用导弹瞄准菲律宾嘛，还用水炮、激光，甚至派民兵针对菲律宾呢。

jeff
Of course, if a full - scale war breaks out between China and the United States, the Typhon medium - range missile could immediately put all Chinese naval ships and bases in great danger. In addition, such medium - range missiles can effectively strike all important and valuable assets in China's coastal provinces in a very short time. This is why the china has repeatedly called for the dismantling of this missile system near China. Mid - range missiles are much cheaper than ICBMs and can be deployed in large numbers.

那肯定啊，要是中美全面开战，“堤丰”中程导弹一下子就能让中国海军舰艇和基地陷入大麻烦。

而且，这种中程导弹能在短时间内就把沿海省份的重要设施都给炸了。这就是为啥中国一直喊着要拆除周边的这套导弹系统。

中程导弹比洲际弹道导弹便宜多了，能大量部署呢。

Allan
Cry china, cry! LOL. You started this problem. Now, Asian NATO is in full swing, arms race is hot in the area. Well, at least Lockheed Martin, India and South Korean arms manufacturers are getting a bump in their business.

哭吧！哈哈。这事儿就是你们挑起的。现在亚洲版北约搞得热火朝天，这地方军备竞赛也激烈起来了。至少洛克希德·马丁，还有印度和韩国的武器制造商们这下生意都能火起来了。

Asiand
C has no one to blame for its self for constantly harassing the Philippines and stealing its territory and resources. We should arm the Philippines to the teeth! Cry about it China!

你们老是骚扰菲律宾，与菲律宾的领土和资源纠纷，这能怪谁，只能怪他们自己。咱就该把菲律宾武装到牙齿！中国，哭去吧！

Yesw
China opposes (fill in the blank) and no one else cares.

中国反对，但谁在乎啊。

freeokin
China can put Manila at risk in ten minutes with her hypersonic missiles. Typhon is no match. If Marcos boy want to play he should dig underground to protect himself.

中国用高超音速导弹十分钟就能让马尼拉陷入危险。“堤丰”根本没法比。要是小马科斯想玩，他最好挖个地洞躲起来保命。

Asiand
Go ahead and start WW3! Can you imagine how many people will die when Chin's cities start getting hit? Most densely populated cities in the world

有种就去挑起第三次世界大战啊！你能想象那些城市被攻击得牺牲多少人吗？那可都是世界上人口最密集的城市。

Sacto
First of all
Stop pretending you are
"a Proud Asian in Asia"
Because
#1
No proud Asian in Asia would ever respond to A United Nations report denouncing the prevalence of black “contemporary slavery” within the U.S. prison system.
By saying
"Blah. Blah. Blah"
Only a Proud Cawcasion in the US would say
Blah! Blah! Blah! to that.
#2
You have 31,000 posts on only 3 issues
A. Pro Israel
B. Anti Palestine
And
C. Anti China
Those are the same positions of Proud Cawcasions in the US
(But not Proud Asians in Asia....home to 62% of the worlds Muslims)
#3
You go offline when it is afternoon here in Asia
(Because it's bedtime in the US)
And come back online when it's evening in Asia
( but morning in the U.S.)
Second of all Remember what China did to the US and it's 16 nation UN Allies in the Korean War???
On Dec 12, 1950
Time magazine headlines read
THE NATION: Defeat
"Caught in the desperate retreat were 140,000 American troops, the flower of the U.S. Army—
almost the whole effective Army the U.S. had.
20,000 British, Turkish and other allies, some 100,000 South Korean soldiers.
It was defeat—the worst defeat the U.S. had ever suffered."
General Omar Bradley called it “the greatest military disaster in the history of the United States.”
The Secretary of State Dean Acheson later called it “The worst defeat of American arms since the Second Battle of Bull Run,”

首先，别再装什么“亚洲自豪的亚洲人”了。

原因一：亚洲任何一个有骨气的亚洲人，都不会对联合国谴责美国监狱系统普遍存在黑人“现代奴隶制”的报告，就只会说“巴拉巴拉”。只有美国那些自傲的白人会这么敷衍回应。

原因二：你就围绕三个话题发了3.1万条帖子。A. 支持以色列；B. 反对巴勒斯坦；C. 反对中国。这跟美国那些自傲的白人立场一样（但亚洲自豪的亚洲人可

不是这样。亚洲可是全球62%msl的家园）。

原因三：亚洲这边下午你就下线了（因为美国那边该睡觉了），亚洲晚上的时候你又上线了（但美国那边是早上）。

其次，还记得中国在朝鲜战争中是怎么收拾美国及其16个联合国盟友的吗？1950年12月12日，《时代》杂志头条写着：《国家：战败》，“陷入绝望撤退的是14万美军，那可是美国陆军的精锐——几乎是美国现有的全部主力部队。还有2万英国、土耳其等国盟友的部队，以及约10万韩国士兵。这是一场惨败——美国有史以来遭受的最惨重失败。”奥马尔·布拉德利将军称其为“美国历史上最严重的军事灾难”。美国国务卿迪安·艾奇逊后来称其为“自布尔溪第二次战役以来，美军遭遇的最惨痛失败”。

stavros
why is china so riled up with typhon? it can only hit target at 200km as stated in the article. but ph already has brahmos missiles which can hit target at 290 - 300km away

中国为啥对“堤丰”反应这么大啊？文章里不是说它射程就200公里嘛。菲律宾早就有“布拉莫斯”导弹了，射程能到290 - 300公里呢。

Nelson　Dizon
The world tells China to take a hike.

全世界都想让你们哪儿凉快哪儿待着去。

Robert
Hey china, nobody cares what you think.

嘿，没人在乎你怎么想。