What Chinese tech dominance means for the world | DW News

德国之声新闻：中国科技霸权地位对世界意味着什么

China is holding its annual National People's Congress. It's a huge and largely ceremonious gathering of Co unist Party officials – a time for the country's leadership to take stock of the current economic situation and signal its plans for the future. DW’s China Analyst Clifford Coonan breaks down the latest developments and what the meeting could signal for the country's tech industry.

It's almost like the traditional tech companies like Alibaba, which is the old. It's kind of like old tech got too big. They were seen as expanding too fast and were seen as a threat. The new national champions are things like iaomi and also DeepSeek.

China is holding its annual National People's Congress. It's a huge and largely ceremonious gathering of Co unist Party officials, a time for the country's leadership to take stock of the current economic situation and signal its plans for the future.

中国正在举行一年一度的全国人民代表大会。这是一场规模宏大且在很大程度上具有仪式性的聚会——这是国家领导人评估当前经济形势并释放未来规划信号的时刻。德国之声的中国事务分析师克利福德·库南剖析最新动态，以及此次会议对中国科技产业释放的信号。

这就好比像阿里巴巴这样的传统科技公司，它们属于旧有的科技力量。有点像是旧有的科技企业发展得过于庞大了。它们被认为扩张速度太快，且被视作一种威胁。新的“国家冠军企业”则是像小米以及DeepSeek这样的企业。

中国正在举行一年一度的全国人民代表大会。这是一场官员参与的盛大且在很大程度上具有仪式性的聚会，是国家领导层评估当前经济形势并表明未来规划的时刻。

以下是各国网友的评论:

AfsalPA
Thank you China for making Technology affordable to everyone

感谢中国，让每个人都能负担得起科技产品。

InnocentObserver-21c
It means the world is no longer slaves to U.S. tech barons.

这意味着世界不再是美国科技巨头的附庸。

LiberRaider
You know that everyt time you comment on YouTube you make a tech Baron richer?

你知道吗，每次你在油管上评论，都会让某个科技巨头更富有。

michihofer587
Better compete with China and innovate better technology rather than shouting.

最好与中国展开竞争，研发出更好的技术，而不是只会叫嚷。

freedomsong9747
@michiofer587 why can't we cooperate instead of compete?

为什么我们不能合作，非要竞争呢？

the0neObserver
too bad no matter how hard you try, it won't fool the world anymore. Everyone looks at the result. Cheaper goods means affordability, more than 90% of home ownership means less homelessness. Enormous achievement in high tech sector industries for the future. You keep saying the economy is in trouble with 5% gdp's growth, compared to any EU's country, US, UK, Canada etc. who is ahead?

太糟糕了，无论你怎么努力，都无法再欺骗世界了。每个人都看结果。商品便宜了，大家都能买得起，超过90%的住房拥有率，无家可归的人更少了。在未来的高科技产业领域取得了巨大成就。你一直说经济有问题，即便GDP增长5% ，但与其他欧盟国家、美国、英国、加拿大等等相比，谁更领先呢？

atanacioluna292
True, it is an alternative way to order society. It does not feel bad when you travel in China, great competence, orderly, clean, inexpensive, and friendly. How true are these parameters in the US?

确实，这是一种构建社会秩序的不同方式。在中国旅行感觉很不错，井然有序、干净整洁、物价实惠，而且人们很友好。美国在这些方面又有多少是符合的呢？

kolviczd6885
What Chinese tech dominance means for the world? - Affordability for everyone (If they don't turn into another greedy American tech companies)

中国科技主导地位对世界意味着什么？让每个人都能消费得起

youcristineltube
To me it means they worked hard and they were succesfull. My view of the world is massively changing during this days.

我认为，他们努力工作并取得了成功。最近我的世界观正在发生巨大的变化。

enissay9950
it means cheap quality technology for everyone. no more wall between the garden and the jungle people.

这意味着每个人都能消费得起价格实惠且质量不错的科技产品。再也没有隔阂了。

drp
Agreed, The world 's problem is rich people get richer easier and greed , left almost no resources to poor people, however most of governments don't know how to solve it.

同意。世界的问题在于富人越来越富，越来越贪婪，几乎没给穷人留下什么资源，然而大多数政府都不知道如何解决这个问题。

anthropyguo9997
This expert attended 15 such gatherings in China but still knows next to nothing about china and still espouses the same liberal dribbles about China. Such an unwillingness to learn and engage with China.

这位专家参加了15次在中国的这样的集会，但仍然对中国几乎一无所知，还在宣扬那些老一套的关于中国的废话。他这是不愿意去了解和接触中国。

jarek1370
EU should cooperate closely with China to stand against USA

欧盟应该与中国密切合作，一起对抗美国。

dondon8098
It means no colonization of other countries, unlike what the West did in the past. It’s time for Europe to move forward, as China is committed to making technology accessible to everyone.

这意味着不会像西方过去那样对其他国家进行殖民。欧洲是时候向前发展了，中国致力于让每个人都能用上科技。

reasonrusfromme9731
It’s not merely ceremonial event. It gives the marching order to all levels of government to implement the 5-year strategic plan and holds government and party officials accountable for achieving the set goals. This is how China operates. So far they have demonstrated their successes. They also discuss lessons learned in smaller sessions. Each province will also set goals.

这不仅仅是一场仪式性的活动。它向各级政府下达了实施五年战略规划的指令，并要求官员对实现既定目标负责。这就是中国的运作方式。到目前为止，他们已经展示了自己的成功。他们还会在小型会议上讨论吸取的经验教训。每个省份也会设定目标。

yong4265
This guy doesn't have a clue about China.

这家伙对中国一无所知。

Make_America_Native_Again_7
Germany arrests internet users for criticizing Israel

德国逮捕了批评以色列的互联网用户。

YingLiao-j4y
Come on , stop talking ideology, the Chinese people have had all kinds of ideologies in their 3000 year history, none of yours is new to them.

得了吧，别再谈意识形态了。中国人民在其3000年的历史中经历过各种各样的意识形态，你们说的这些对他们来说都不新鲜。

Shining237
Best wishes to China on their future endeavors.

衷心祝愿中国在未来的发展中一切顺利。

fredlu7638
This guy knows nothing about Chinese and its culture.

这家伙对中国及其文化一无所知。

Reed-sh6wi
Thank you, China, for de ocratizing the good stuff for the rest of us.

感谢中国，让我们其他人也能平等地享受到好的东西。

stvdmc2011
US government dont have the powers over company? Have you ask asml, Tsmc,?

美国政府对公司没有控制权吗？你问过阿斯麦、台积电了吗？

Clarahalfstone77
US gov also mistreated Alstom, a French firm, let’s not forget that

美国政府也曾不公平地对待法国公司阿尔斯通，大家别忘了这一点。

waynegore5291
europe: meet to schedule next meet.
china: meet to formalize action plan.
usa: meet to quarral and fight.

欧洲：开会是为了安排下一次会议。

中国：开会是为了确定行动计划。

美国：开会就是为了争吵和争斗。

briant3404
USA has a 2 party sytem where both parties are SUPPOSED to be on the same side... this is REALLY (not) productive right

美国实行两党制，按道理两党应该站在同一立场上，但这真的并不有成效，对吧？

4mb127
nah, both usa and china is obey whatever the big man says

得了吧，美国和中国都是不管大人物说什么就照做。

caspar9794
The Chinese political mindset doesn't encourage individual extravaganza. The US does. The Chinese socialism tempered with free movement of capital could ultimately lead to a much better and more sustainable society

中国的理念不鼓励个人的铺张浪费。美国却鼓励。中国的社会主义结合资本的自由流动，最终可能建设成为一个更好、更可持续发展的社会。

humansarecrazybeing5730
This means western colonizers have to move on

这意味着西方殖民者必须改变了。

LLee0
He forgot one fact: there are still a lot of fierce competitions among the small private start-ups in China! These small startups are getting a lot of funding from the private sector as well as the government.

他忘了一个事实：中国的小型私营初创企业之间仍然存在着激烈的竞争！这些小型初创企业从私营部门以及政府那里获得了大量资金支持

kinngrimm
If not for Biden jum on the American First train, TSCM would have built a chip production facility here in Germany. Makes me question if there is not a long plan to weaken Europe behind a lot of what we see on the world stage of late from the US. Well there were the strategic meetings posted on c-span 1989-92 which named Europe as a possible competitor in the 21 century and the goal should be to keep them from uniting also militarily and find pressure points where certain nations could be undermined. Spain and Poland were named as examples, but Greece and Hungary also might be counted to those. Just know when i say weak points, i don't imply bad faith from those nations, but that they are brought into situations where they could not keep promises given to the EU. Like when Greece had money problems badly a few years ago, Goldman Sachs against EU regulations gave more money to Greece. However that may have effected the overall situation it is already an attack on EU sovereignty.

如果不是拜登奉行“美国优先”政策，台积电本会在德国建立一个芯片生产工厂。这让我怀疑，美国最近在世界舞台上的很多行为背后，是不是有着削弱欧洲的长远计划。

嗯，在1989年至1992年期间，美国公共事务有线卫星电视网（C-SPAN）播出的战略会议中提到，欧洲可能是21世纪的竞争对手，目标应该是阻止他们在军事上联合起来，并找到可以削弱某些国家的施压点。

西班牙和波兰被当作例子提了出来，但希腊和匈牙利也可能被算在其中。要知道，当我说这些弱点时，我并不是暗示这些国家有恶意，而是说他们陷入了无法履行对欧盟承诺的境地。

就像几年前希腊严重的资金问题时，高盛违反欧盟规定给了希腊更多资金。不管这对整体局势产生了怎样的影响，这已经是对欧盟主权的一种侵犯了。

michaelasamoah2390
It means prosperity whiles the Europeans as usual are stupidly engaging in wars

这意味着繁荣，而欧洲人还像往常一样愚蠢地卷入战争。

wynetsang
Science and Civilisation in China (1954–present) is an ongoing series of books about the history of science and technology in China published by Cambridge University Press. It was initiated and edited by British historian Joseph Needham (1900–1995). China has several thousand years of tech experience while the West only has several hundred years since the end of the Dark Age.

《中国科学技术史》（1954年至今）是剑桥大学出版社出版的一系列关于中国科学技术史的书籍。该系列由英国历史学家李约瑟（1900-1995）发起并编辑。中国有几千年的科技经验，而西方自黑暗时代结束以来只有几百年的科技发展历史。

Ddsggcfg
If there is always another high-tech product Series to choose from, this is good for world security and balance.

如果总是有另一个高科技产品系列可供选择，对世界安全与平衡是有益的。

axelaaronccasanihuachua9073
Clifford es periodista, pero no un economista. Por tanto, no tiene sentido que le hagan preguntas sobre el crecimiento del gdp de China para este años o distintos temas económicos.

克利福德是一名记者，但不是经济学家。因此，问他关于中国今年的国内生产总值（GDP）增长或其他各种经济问题是没有意义的。

viviendomisabatico1587
"The Chinese economy has structural issues"
What economy in the world does not have structural issues?
The world itself and humanity itself does not have a bunch of structural issues?
What about Germany, France, the UK, the USA, Japan?
Give me a break!

“中国经济存在结构性问题”

世界上哪个经济体不存在结构性问题呢？

世界本身和人类自身不也存在一堆结构性问题吗？

德国、法国、英国、美国、日本又如何呢？

别逗我了！

waynegore5291
Obviously europeans lost their minds.

显然，欧洲人失去理智了。

jusebacho
Europe is falling and don't doing nothing to improved

欧洲在衰落，却不采取措施改善这种状况。

web3out
More technology for the common people is good for humanity as a whole.

让普通人拥有更多的科技产品对整个人类都有好处。

web3out
There is no over capacity if there is continuous buyers.... it is just supply and demand. The invisible hand of the market will handle itself.

如果有持续的买家，就不存在产能过剩。这只是供求关系的问题。市场的无形之手会自行调节。

summer031977
What Chinese tech dominance means for Europe?? Europe is lagging behind in all parameters

中国科技主导地位对欧洲意味着什么呢？欧洲在各个方面都落后了。

wahchili6077
can you provide the data, which country over 19 trillion GDP, increase 5% GDP per year.
China's energy price is significantly low price. This is the way chinese goods are cheaper. Not from the deflection.

你能提供数据吗，哪个GDP超过19万亿美元的国家能每年实现5%的GDP增长。

中国的能源价格相当低。这就是中国商品更便宜的原因。并不是因为什么不正当手段。

thomasrogers9146
NO ONE NO NATION NO COUNTRY IS ENTITLE TO SUCCESS.. EVERY ONE LIVING ON EARTH IS SUBJECT TO THE SAME NATURE'S LAWS. THE LAW OF AND EFFECT IS APPLICABLE TO ALL..IF CHINA MAKES THE INVESTMENT DO THE HARD WORK THEN THEY DESERVE THEIR SUCCESS. CASE CLOSE.

没有人、没有民族、没有国家天生就理应获得成功。地球上的每一个人都受制于同样的自然法则。因果律适用于所有人。如果中国进行了投资并付出了努力，那么他们就理应获得成功。事情就是这样。

继续阅读：科技   霸权   中国经济

此文由 三泰虎 编辑，未经允许不得转载！：首页 > 大国 » 德媒：中国正在召开两会，中国的科技霸权对全世界意味着什么