征地太难，项目动不动就拖延数十年！印度最高法院裁决，或简化政府的征地程序

Supreme Court ruling set to ease govt land acquisition process

印度最高法院裁决有望简化政府土地征收程序

NEW DELHI: Frowning at vexatious litigation relating to land acquisition, which delays projects for decades, Supreme Court Thursday ruled that when a govt acquires land for public purposes using its sovereign powers, it cannot be frustrated by creation of third-party rights after the acquisition.

A bench of CJI Sanjiv Khanna and Justice Sanjay Kumar said even a public body for whom an acquisition was done can't give the land to someone through a private agreement as only govt has the power to withdraw acquisition for the entire land, or a portion of it.

Litigation relating to acquired land, mainly because of creation of third-party rights, has been a key factor for delay in execution of many projects, especially national highways.

新德里消息：针对那些因征地引发的无理诉讼导致项目拖延数十年的情况，印度最高法院于周四作出裁决，当政府运用其主权权力为公共目的征收土地时，在征收之后所产生的第三方权利不能阻碍土地征收的进行。

由首席大法官桑吉夫·坎纳和法官桑杰·库马尔组成的合议庭表示，即使是为其进行土地征收的公共机构，也不能通过私人协议将土地给予他人，因为只有政府有权撤回对整块土地或部分土地的征收决定。

与已征收土地相关的诉讼，主要是由于第三方权利的产生，一直是许多项目（尤其是国家高速公路项目）执行延误的关键因素。

This ruling may help ease the impediments caused by post-acquisition litigation

The case that warranted the ruling pertained to acquisition of 33 acres abutting Narela-Bawana Road to enable Delhi Agricultural Marketing Board to establish its grain market. The acquisition notification was issued in Oct 30, 1963 and the award determining compensation issued on Jan 10, 1986. When a woman claimed ownership over a portion of the land, the Board chairman surreptitiously entered into a private agreement with her and agreed to release half of the claimed land to her while permitting her to claim compensation for the other half.

这项裁决可能有助于缓解因征收后诉讼所造成的阻碍。

促使作出这一裁决的案件涉及毗邻纳雷拉-巴瓦纳路（Narela-Bawana Road）的33英亩土地的征收，目的是让德里农产品营销委员会建立其粮食市场。征收通知于1963年10月30日发布，确定补偿的裁决于1986年1月10日作出。当一名女性声称对该土地的一部分拥有所有权时，该委员会主席秘密地与她签订了一份私人协议，同意将所声称土地的一半归还给她，同时允许她就另一半土地索取补偿。

以下是印度时报读者的评论：

Sudeep
My opinion is to acquire all the land in India by govt and make people their slaves , any way common man are slaves in India is the fact . Without paying real cash govt want to take your land for public interest , what type of injustice is this ? Whose public interest? India is a circus you know .

我的观点是，印度政府应该把国内所有的土地都征收了，然后让人们都成为政府的奴隶，反正事实上印度的普通民众本来就是奴隶。政府不想支付真金白银，却以公共利益为由拿走你的土地，这算哪门子的公正？这到底是谁的公共利益？你知道的，印度就是个马戏团，乱象丛生的地方。

Vinay Kukreti
1986 to 2025 - 39yrs, isn't this a fraud on our nation???

从1986年到2025年——39年啊，这难道不是对我们国家的欺诈吗？

V Ramakrishna S
Who was the then Chaiman of the Board

当时的委员会主席是谁呢？

BHASKAR
Don't worry...in this corruption enterprise, politicians and bureaucrats of all hues and political leanings are united in their desire

别担心，在这场腐败勾当中，各种不同派别和政治倾向的政客和官僚们，他们的欲望都是一致的。

Desai
Once the land is aquiered by Goverment under sovereign powers act no one can claim all or part of that land and there should not be any side agreement ever.

一旦政府根据主权权力法案征收了土地，就没人能宣称对该土地的全部或部分拥有所有权，而且永远都不应该有任何私下协议。

Shekar Natesh
No need for our wonderful, highly efficient SC to rule the land acquisition process. Our dirty, filthy corrupt politicians are already doing it in the illegal way. Ex: DK Shivakumar, KJ George, Kumaraswamy, Yeddy just to name a few

我们那 “出色” 又 “高效” 的最高法院根本没必要对土地征收程序作出裁决。我们那些又脏又腐败的政客们早就以非法的方式在征地了。比如说：DK 希瓦库马尔（DK Shivakumar）、KJ 乔治（KJ George）、库马尔斯瓦米（Kumaraswamy）、耶迪（Yeddy），这只是随便举几个例子而已。

Gulshan Sachdev
such a long time taken by the case to reach its finality. Our Judiciary System needs overhauling and Time Bound Judgement with fixng the responsibility in case of wrong Judgement specially in such cases where rulings have NO AMBIGUITY.

这个案子花了这么长时间才最终定案。我们的司法系统需要全面改革，还需要设定有时间限制的判决，并且在出现错误判决的情况下明确责任，尤其是在像这种裁决不存在任何含糊不清之处的案件中。

Ajay
90 % of muncipality land acquisitions are fraud by municipalities and its counselors in India . They acquire prime lands for revenge and jealousy and later ask huge cash as bribes to return and only few can give this cash most of the people are govt employees, traditional residents etc . For example ,mumcipality notify acres of land for rickshaw stand and they need a little land infact and rest of the land they acquire for making corrupt cash or revenge . You don't belive in some cases they modify this acquisition and take land for this auto stand a mile away inside a place also for the same purpose , this type of fraud and injustice is prevailing throughout in India against poor common man and what supreme court says about this

在印度，90%的市政土地征收都是市政当局及其顾问的欺诈行为。他们出于报复和嫉妒之心征收优质土地，随后索要巨额贿赂才肯归还土地。而大多数人，如政府雇员、原住民等，根本拿不出这笔钱，只有少数人能给得起。

例如，市政部门宣布征收数英亩土地用于建设人力车停车点，可实际上他们只需要一小部分土地，其余的土地都被他们用来谋取不义之财或报复他人。

你可能不信，在某些情况下，他们还会修改征收计划，为了同样的目的，在一英里外的地方征收土地来建机动三轮车停车点。这种欺诈和不公现象在印度各地普遍存在，可怜的普通民众深受其害，而最高法院对此又作何表态呢？

Guest
such is the state of affairs in this country because of land acquisition act passed by UPA govt, that the buyer (govt) decides which land they would acquire and what price they are going to offer, and they acquire the land. there is no say of the seller in this whole process. wtf. what kind of unfair treatment is meted out to seller. he is neither asked his will to sell the land or nor not, nor the price is decided by him. others decide everything and he must agree to it.

印度团结进步联盟（UPA）政府通过的土地征收法案，这个国家的情况就是如此。政府决定征收哪块土地，以及给出什么样的价格，然后就把土地征收了。

在整个过程中，卖家根本没有发言权。真是岂有此理！这对卖家来说是多么不公平的待遇啊。既不询问卖家是否愿意出售土地，价格也不由卖家决定。一切都由别人说了算，卖家还必须得同意。

Lakshmi Narayanan
Hope this judgement takes care of agrilands in way of proposed greenfield airport in the outskirts of Chennai.Vested interests should be taught a lesson

希望这项判决能够保护那些位于钦奈市郊、可能因拟建的新机场而受影响的农田。那些既得利益者应该受到教训。

Ajay
In India before 2013 and rules prime lands of various people were acquired due to jelousy , revenge mentality of elected members against some people , in the name of making toilets , bus stops , acres of lands were notified and for decades they do nothing ,even after 20 , 30 years nothing is done . When some muncipal member hate you they make plan to acquire your land was very very common in India . Many many people lost their land for nothing . No proper compensation or nothing . I know a case where a house in muncipal area was acquired because one member ask a man's daughter to sleep with him and she denied. Common man suffer so much in India and there is no justice actually and 90% of elected members has criminal cases of real are there . So when courts support mafias where public gets justice .

在2013年相关法规出台之前，在印度，一些民选官员出于嫉妒和报复心理，以修建厕所、公交站为名，征收了许多人的优质土地。

他们发布了土地征收通知，可几十年来却什么都没做，即便过了二三十年，依然毫无动静。

如果某个市政官员讨厌你，他就会计划征收你的土地，这种情况在印度极为常见。

很多人平白无故地失去了自己的土地，没有得到合理的补偿，甚至什么都没有。

我知道一个案例，在市政区域内有一所房子被征收，原因是一名官员要求房子主人的女儿陪睡，遭到了拒绝。

在印度，普通民众遭受了太多苦难，实际上根本没有公平正义可言，而且90%的民选官员确实都有刑事案件在身。

既然法院都在支持黑手党，那民众又能从哪里得到公正呢？

Niranjan
What powers WAQF board has should only be the power of government: To take any land for public use only.

瓦克夫委员会所拥有的权力，应该仅限于政府的权力范围：即只能为了公共用途而征用土地。

Kricket
The problem is not the law. it's the time. if, this was dealt with in a few months, there would have been no issue. 60 years your lordshios, pray continue so your grand children and nephews whom you anoint to follow you have a job!

问题不在于法律，而在于时间。如果这件事能在几个月内处理好，就不会有任何问题了。法官大人啊，都过去60年了，求求你们继续这样下去吧，这样你们指定要接班的孙子和侄子们才能有工作可做！

Arjun Reddy
it took them all this time to pass a correct judgement.

他们花了这么长时间才作出一个正确的判决。